-
Posts
18334 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Everything posted by El-P
-
Because Jerry Lawler never does a no-sell routine during his comeback. Never. As illustrated from 00:42 and on :
-
Let's be precise : I never said Lawler was no-selling the entire match after his comeback. I said Lawler no-sells the offense that his opponent is dishing out during the comeback sequence. I thought it was clear from the beginning we were talking about *comeback sequence*. Not for everyone I guess. I dropped the Warrior's name just because to me, the dropping down the strap before the comeback is like Warrior shaking the ropes : a visual gimmick : "I don't care much for any comeback that consist of no-selling. Lawler dropping the strap equals Warrior shaking the ropes to me." I could have said "equals Sting hitting his chest", and this would have probably been less offensive to some sensitive souls.
-
Except for the times that he doesn't, which is all the time. This isn't about sacred cows. This is about you being wrong. Explain why you're right, or stop trying to front like you are. Ok son, read my last post back if you can understand the words. I think I said *3 times* something to the effect of "well, that's the impression I got, but maybe I'm wrong, and if that's the case, then I'm wrong". So at this point, you're just being a dickhead for the sake of it. Maybe you're not used to people acknowledging the fact that they may be wrong. And I'm not the only one saying that Lawler was hulking up, but you're no-selling that one. So my best guess is at this time you're just trolling me. So ease up, have a drink, and stop acting like a douche. Thanks in advance.
-
It amazes me that Regal is only 43. It seems like he's been around forever.
-
Simply one of the greatest bump ever at the end. Tito was really good, I opened my eyes on his work during the WWF SC poll. Much better than the perenial "underrated" Brad Armstrong, who wasn't that great beyond being a super solid mechanic.
-
Tito, Steve Grey, Chigusa Nagayo and Kyoko Inoue stand out to me. Can't believe I forgot Kyoko.
-
I had no idea Norman Smiley was employed by WWE.
-
Well, I'm glad I'm not totally hallucinating then, because at some point, I was just wondering if my brain was totally fucked up (and since I'm too lazy to dig into my external hard drive for Lawler matches...)
-
I've seen shitload of Lawler's match, and that's the impression I got from it. Now, if I'm wrong and if it's A/not paying enough attention, it means I don't like Lawler's comebacks because it produced the same effect on me as a "no-sell" comeback. The two things I don't care for in a Lawler match are 1/overuse of punches, as great as they might be and 2/dropping down the strap and comeback bit. But hey, if I'm wrong, I'm wrong. As far as Backlund goes, nope, I was talking about guys who didn't do the "no-sell" comebacks, not comparing Lawler and Backlund's selling in general. You can sell well for an entire match then do a shitty "no-sell" comeback gimmick, like Sting would for instance (that ruined the Regal match from BATB96). Never talked about selling in the general sense of the word. I enjoy Lawler's selling, it's actually the thing I probably like the most about him (it's not like I can enjoy his varied offense...) So I'll settle for : I may very well be wrong about the "no-sell" bit after dropping down the strap, but let's say I'm not a fan of Lawler's comebacks, which give me an impression of "out of the blue" each time around.
-
EDIT : read my post Dylan, I'm was not talking about that *at all*. And yes, Lawler no sold his opponents offense during comeback. Drop the strap, no-sell, punches. Every time. I know tha shall not invoque the King's name in vain in 2011, but still, let's be honest here. It worked wonders for him. I find it annoying.
-
If Lawler's comebacks = Warrior's comebacks, all babyface comebacks = Warrior's comebacks. Yeah, because that's what they all did, no-selling with a little visual gimmick thrown in : Ricky Morton, Tito Santana, Ricky Steamboat, Randy Savage, Brad Armtrong, Atsushi Onita, Chigusa Nagayo, Bob Backlund, Bret Hart... well, I could go on and on. Some did the no-sell routine, it worked for Hogan, Sting, Lawler, Warrior, even Tatanka (oh yeah), but not every babyface in wrestling was about making a comeback by just stopping selling for the heel. I don't care for this stuff, it annoys me every time.
-
Watching the debut of the new Skycrappers in retrospect, The Undertaker gimmick really made Mark Callous. Sid had megastar written all over him. When you see Mean Mark Callous taking his place, not so much. Not much presence, not much charisma, just a tall red-haired guy with pale skin and a few spectacular spots. Funny how things worked.
-
Girls cheered him. Male fans, not as much. cf Survivor Series 96. The more I watch Michael Hayes circa 89-90, the more I think Micheals copied his looks. Shawn still coming out to "Sexy boy" with the same kind of outfit in his 40's with balding hair and crooked eyes was much more offensive.
-
He worked less flashy than in 95-96 though. Bumper heel, sure, but not jumping around face like he became later.
-
I always felt like Michaels was a natural face as a worker and a natural heel as a character. That's actually pretty accurate.
-
I had been a big fan of his first heel turn, and wasn't thrilled to watch him as a face. Not that I knew he was a dickhead in real life, but things never clicked to me with Shawn as a babyface in 95/96. He was just a natural heel.
-
If this was the standard, there would be no babyfaces in wrestling.
-
Agreed. Shawn was an asshole in real life, and great wrestling characters are an extension of what you really are. Shawn as a face could work for a minuet or two because he was flashy. But his personnality was just repulsive, he was a whiner, a cheater, a manipulative little jack-off bitch. That's why I also think his best run as far as character goes remains Summer/Fall of 1997. He was much more fun as a heel than a face.
-
Break it down 2: Alternative match structures
El-P replied to JerryvonKramer's topic in Pro Wrestling
In the same vein, I hate TV matches where they sell like they took a beating after 3 minutes of spots. -
Flair looks like he's about to die. I can't believe this shit is on TV and people are actually paid to put this crap together. This stuff was old and had overstayed its welcome 13 years ago, and Flair, Hogan and Sting are still on TV along with Bischoff, while Russo writes the show. TNA is the worst promotion ever.
-
He's really the face equivalent of terry Funk drunk selling or Dick Murdock's antics, or Hennig's überbumping. Bret Hart was a much more realistic seller than Steamboat. Best selling ? Kawada. Hokuto.
-
[1992-11-21-WCW-Saturday Night] Big Van Vader vs Dustin Rhodes
El-P replied to Loss's topic in November 1992
I was less thinking in terms of bumps but rather in terms of Cac asking Vader to potato him.- 15 replies
-
- WCW
- Saturday Night
-
(and 6 more)
Tagged with:
-
I don't care much for any comeback that consist of no-selling. Lawler dropping the strap equals Warrior shaking the ropes to me.
-
Mechanically perfect, no doubt about that, but not exactly graceful. Graceful to me is Jinzei Shinzaki, Misawa at his best, Barry Windham. Kyoko was pretty graceful actually. Yeah, I'm glad it turned out fine ! I thought I remembered that. You are the one who probably broke the news to me too. I'm not at all the kind who drools over baby's pictures, but since this is Kyoko, I can't help but find this adorable. Kyoko always had the nicest smile anyway. She's kinda the Kim Deal of joshi.
-
These are the small aesthetic things I enjoyed in US wrestling. It fit the character too.