Jump to content
Pro Wrestling Only

1997 Hype


Loss

Recommended Posts

It's pretty close to being a reality. It's an insanely loaded year. When we realized that the Cibernetico is followed by the Misawa/Kawada/Kobashi Carnival finals, and that's followed by the famous Austin/Bret streetfight on RAW, it really put in perspective how ridiculously good this year was. Many things that are borderline picks would be strong picks in just about any other year, and many things we'd normally include for filler just won't find their way on to this set. We'll end up leaving many good matches on the cutting room floor, but I think we're going to really capture what 1997 was all about, and the end result is that this should be the highest-quality yearbook we have ever done. If there's a promotion in the world other than AAA that wasn't having a banner year, I sure don't know about it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 81
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

It's pretty close to being a reality. It's an insanely loaded year. When we realized that the Cibernetico is followed by the Misawa/Kawada/Kobashi Carnival finals, and that's followed by the famous Austin/Bret streetfight on RAW, it really put in perspective how ridiculously good this year was. Many things that are borderline picks would be strong picks in just about any other year, and many things we'd normally include for filler just won't find their way on to this set. We'll end up leaving many good matches on the cutting room floor, but I think we're going to really capture what 1997 was all about, and the end result is that this should be the highest-quality yearbook we have ever done. If there's a promotion in the world other than AAA that wasn't having a banner year, I sure don't know about it.

If the match quality is that high, 1997 sounds like a good candidate for a supplemental set down the road if/when it sells well enough to warrant it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes. Should be a great time all around. The two things I am most interested going in will be the lucha which is a discovery on every yearbook set since I am a novice in lucha and the joshi since 1997 seems like one of the highest quality years post the golden age with GAEA coming into its own and AJW still cranking out some great stuff.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hayabusa is a wrestler I'm looking forward to seeing in 1997, along with Kintaro Kanemura and Masato Tanaka. FMW had really good in-ring years in 1995 and 1996. I love Onita death matches, but Hayabusa did change the tone of the promotion. The violence was still there, but there was a lot more wrestling to go with it. I think that only increases as the decade goes on, to a point where FMW may be the only promotion in the world by 1999 that's better at the end of the decade than it was at the beginning of it.

 

For Japanese indies, we also get our first glimpse of Big Japan, and Michinoku Pro continues their hot run. Lucha has CMLL and (very little, if any) AAA, but also has Promo Azteca, with famous Rey/Santo and Santo/Psicosis matches, along with the famous riot.

 

Joshi is more splintered too. Soup mentioned AJW and GAEA, but I'm happy with the choices for JWP, LLPW and even Jd' as well. There are also a couple of women's matches from FMW.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm actually going to throw this question to the group.

 

Is it critical that Bret vs Undertaker from Summerslam '97 be included in full? Or can it just be the finish? Obviously, the angle was huge, but I have no idea about the match quality itself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Their One Night Only match will be on, right? Doesn't it kind of have to be?

 

Honestly, I don't see any reason to include that and the full SummerSlam match, which is really, really long when you throw in entrances and the post-match (I think about 40 minutes total). The SummerSlam ending would be just fine.

 

Comparing the two matches in full would be an interesting exercise but it's probably one to save for those who really want to do it. With such a loaded year it's a cut that can be easily made.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On the flip side, I do think Hogan/Rodman vs Luger/Giant should be in full, because of the announcers flipping out about every single thing Dennis Rodman does. I think finish only there would be wrong. We will also include Hogan vs Sting from Starrcade in full even though it's not really a good match.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I tend to think SS97 is pretty dull when lined up with ONO as far as quality goes. The only significant parts, in terms of story, would be the Bret-Shawn exchanges, but that's something that can still be captured with the finish, which is probably all you need.

 

I'd argue One Night Only in full is more essential. Probably Taker's best singles of the year and one of Bret's best too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Agree with another vote for clipping down Taker vs. Bret. I do think the Hart Foundation 1997 is something I wont object to some slight cherry picking around since Will has already done a pre-existing set that is comprehensive. For instance if its SS 97 in full vs. a LLPW match, I lean LLPW since a. its unlikely I will pick up whole shows of that in the future and b. given the market it seems unlikely that there will ever be comprehensive Joshi 1997 or CMLL 1997 sets at this point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

War Games is trickier for me that Bret vs. Taker because there is not a superior version like One Night ONly is for Bret vs. Taker but I still lean towards clipping it for some cool hidden gems beneath the surface enough. I trust you and Will's judgement as so far you both have done an amazing job of finding some totally unique stuff but also including the mainstream US promotions where no outside individual could be off put by picking up the set.

 

Also even if stuff doesn't make it on here, that is what the errata is for.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The other match I'll ask about is Owen vs Vader at One Night Only. Does it need to go on at all? I like the match, but I think Bret/Undertaker and Shawn/Davey Boy are the two must-have things from that show.

 

Soup, we definitely won't forsake any of the more rare stuff. I just want to make sure we don't take the WWF/WCW clipping too far.

 

I really like Ultimo vs Alex Wright from Fall Brawl, but that doesn't feel essential either, even though it is a very good match.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Wargames might be worth having in full, just because its the last proper one that WCW ever ran. The 1998 one was the 3man/3team mess and 2000's was Russo's clusterfuck that was Wargames in name only.

 

Owen/Vader was great, but is not essential when talking about ONO.

 

Dragon/Wright was great too. I think it could be included under the reasoning that WCW was going through a stage where they were putting more emphasis on the undercard with longer matches.

 

I think I need to get in this yearbook.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...