goodhelmet

Earlier Dylan said we had 10-15 voters posting here. I got Jose, Kris Z, Harrington, Musgrave, jdw and who else?

Your first mistake is in assuming that Don Muraco is a decent wrestler. I have yet to see a good Muraco singles match and he may end up absent on the new WWF redo set. As for the Rude match, who knows?

The misogyny argument works better than the racist argument. Having said that, we can discuss it on the next yearbook podcast.

Don't mince words. You could have just deleted the post and nobody would know any better.

Why not just make it a call-in show? OK, I think an open ended call in show using talk shoe would be a pain in the ass. We have a panel of 6-7 people right now including TWO CANADIANS!!! If Bret can't get a fair shake with 2 Canadians, there isn't anything else I can do. Putting three Canadians on one panel would probably melt my computer.

We should do a podcast on that very topic because I strongly disagree with that statement. There are styles of wrestling that people do not enjoy for whatever reason. We can get into this more on the air. Coming soon... Styles (of wrestling) Clash 2013!!!!

You need to send that comp my way man!!!

Most of the people posting here today weren't posting here 6 years ago.

Brother, I am just hosting. We gave Loss a forum to discuss it. If you engage him, the joshi conversation will be longer.

We'll get to it. OJ, you are exactly right... joshi doesn't get talked about except for a small circle... and I think that small circle already has all the joshi they could want and the joshi on the yearbook is not going to compel them to pick up the yearbook. The podcasts are part infomercial and part funcast. I could drop 30 more minutes on Jerry Lawler and have guys excited about all the Memphis on the set. Those guys are going to pick up the set sometimes just for the Memphis. If I add an hour or two more of joshi to a set, it will not affect the bottom line one bit so I admittedly cater to my base. With that said, since Loss and I do try to stick to the spirit of the yearbooks in giving a nice landscape of wrestling in the year, we may chop a bunch of joshi out, we still have a pretty big clump of matches on every set. I don't know how much more we will discuss joshi on the podcasts unless Childs feels interested in engaging Loss on the subject.

I expected this one to be close and I want to see more discussion.

If Childs and I had any interest in joshi, we would spend more time on it. However, I have not had one person pick up a yearbook who said... Can't wait to see this years joshi selection. Loss spent some time on it and Childs was pretty considerate about it. As Toyota, Hokuo and Kong start rising up, we will talk more about them.

I answered the question in the same post.

I thought this would be much closer after the AWA set and all the love I hear the Rockers getting in reviews from the site. I also didn't take into account the inherent dislike for Shawn Michaels when posting this. To be fair, I know people don't really dig Robert Gibson either.

I thought Regal was boring also. To me, guys like Regal and Buddy Rose are "wrestlers for adults". When you get to a certain age, you get it.

My head

Undertaker has the big time main events. Goldust has some great Midcard stuff going on. Both have had their share of embarrassments.

Initially, I thought this was a no-brainer so why bother? However, with the AWA set and rediscovering the Rockers in the WWF, people are calling them a Top 5 team. I have also seen some pushback on The NWA and teams that worked a southern style. A year ago, I think the Rockers get slaughtered at this board. Now, with more WWF fanboys on board and the AWA stuff, I want to know who people enjoy more!

Just confirming, there is a full blown documentary in addition to the matches?

When did Kofi lose his chest?