Jump to content
Pro Wrestling Only

Carlos Colon


Grimmas

Recommended Posts

Some might call him a poor man's Lawler, but I don't think that's fair. I prefer to think of him as a better Onita than Onita. To me Colon is possibly the best gimmick match worker of all time in the sense that he can get over the gravity of a stipulation, bleed his ass off, make his comeback, et, and do it all with spots that are largely theatrical in nature and MUCH less physically dangerous than you would think. That's not to say he wasn't having wild brawls, but just that he could get a hell of a lot of mileage out of strategic positioning and grimacing on the barbed wire, than most guys could doing suicidal shit in the same setting. The Hansen feud is one of the top five feuds of the 80's (at worst, I could easy argue it at number one), but you also have to give him a ton of credit for having compelling feuds with multiple great matches against guys like Abby and Hercules Ayala. Hell he had a good series with Steve Strong of all people. I'm not sure where he will fall on my list because there are so many guys I really like, but he was able to do a ton v. a wide variety of guys over the course of three decades (arguably four depending on how you feel about his best stuff from this decade).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

He's definitely in the mix for me, probably as a bottom 20 candidate. I guess I'd view his candidacy as similar to Onita's or maybe even Hogan's? From what I've seen, he kept it pretty basic in the ring but was tremendous at projecting his charisma onto a match and at building the intensity of feuds. Maybe a poor man's babyface Lawler as another comparison?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Very tough to find a balance on him. I think a lot of what he did was genius in some ways (in large part because it was simple), I think he's a much more influential worker than people give him credit for (if that is something that matters, paging Loss....), and his ability to carry high level/strong in ring quality feuds against such a wide variety of often limited opponents really impresses me. On the other hand it does hurt him in my eyes a bit that he had barely any television presence at all. It may have been smart booking, but the absence of him in the studio setting, really makes him tougher to peg when you are comparing him to guys with a wide range of big and "little" good matches in their resume. Will easily make my ballot, but I'm not sure I will have him over Invader #1 for PR guys.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have Invader 1 and Colon neck and neck. Invader was a very good t.v. worker, and probably has a higher volume of good matches. I actually think his selling is substantially better than Colon's, and his comebacks are probably just as good if not better too. That said Colon has the all timer feuds, and it's hard not to give extra points for having an excellent series of matches with someone like Ayala. Very torn between those two.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What is a "Rich man's Bruno "? Cause if it remotely means he was somehow better than Bruno then the term should die in a fire. Pardon me, if I'm not getting it.

The same Bruno character, but Puerto Rican and a way better worker. People use a poor man's ___ all the time, so not much of a leap.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

The Hansen/Colon feud is life changing in how great it is, he'd almost get a look at my list for that alone. But beyond that he's looked good in everything I've seen of him, and as Dylan says is just a master at working gimmick matches. He's great as the ace of PR, he has that insane connection to an audience that honestly only a few guys in wrestling can match, the kind that makes everything he's doing seem like life and death. He comes off as a hero to an entire people.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Colon is more agile and has better matches to his name.

 

Bruno has a magical connection to his audience that is not matched by any other babyface, including Colon.

 

Johnny was objecting to the idea that Bruno could be the "poor man's" anything.

 

I didn't feel much compelled to check out more Colon beyond the Hansen series, his flips and things were weird. But he was an effective babyface from what I saw. And that series is great.

 

Bruno is probably a tad underrated as a worker, he's very good at garnering maximum -- as in all-time loudest -- heat, is more effective than Backlund in generating sympathy and has a rough and tumble style that is all its own, like a Angered Gorilla. He wouldn't be making any lists based on his technical ability or matches though. And if he makes mine, it'll be through the intangibles and variety ratings. He will be borderline.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Colon is more agile and has better matches to his name.

 

Bruno has a magical connection to his audience that is not matched by any other babyface, including Colon.

 

Johnny was objecting to the idea that Bruno could be the "poor man's" anything.

 

I didn't feel much compelled to check out more Colon beyond the Hansen series, his flips and things were weird. But he was an effective babyface from what I saw. And that series is great.

 

Bruno is probably a tad underrated as a worker, he's very good at garnering maximum -- as in all-time loudest -- heat, is more effective than Backlund in generating sympathy and has a rough and tumble style that is all its own, like a Angered Gorilla. He wouldn't be making any lists based on his technical ability or matches though. And if he makes mine, it'll be through the intangibles and variety ratings. He will be borderline.

Colon probably sold more tickets than Bruno.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe it's because sometimes they are outside in PR, but the same magical connection does not come across through the electric crowds as they do for Bruno at MSG and Philly.

 

And this is not a knock on Colon, but that would also go for Hogan or Austin or any other very over babyface you care to name. It also won't come into my ratings much because the dial doesn't go to 11. If it did, Bruno would be the only one at 11.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wouldn't argue Colon over Bruno as a drawing card. It's possible, but it's a grand claim to make unless you have the research in front of.

Yeah, that was too definitive and too much of a troll.

 

It depends how you define a draw, but if someone wants to compare the two in drawing I think it would be very close and I could see Colon winning. For example the Anniversary Shows had bigger crowds than MSG. Not to mention those stadium shows. I would love for someone to do this comparison.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This doesn't have to do with the Bruno conversation, just thought I should mention this.

 

I'd make the argument that Colon has the best babyface fire // comeback ever. It's evident in the Hansen feud and extremely clear in the 10/16/82 Flair match. When I binged on Colon a few weeks ago, that's what came across more than anything. Great bleeder, brawler, and seller, but he really wins me over with his comebacks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...