Jump to content
Pro Wrestling Only

Recommended Posts

Posted

I'm the same. I wasn't into Conrad from the Flair show and thought he was a dick honestly. I've come around on him. I've said it before, hearing Prichard's perspective on things (not saying there isn't bullshiting) outweighs any negatives Conrad brings to the show.

 

In the end, I agree, and that's why I keep listening. I love the eras they're discussing. I am learning stuff. And sometimes they make me laugh. I'll put up with some annoyance now and then, as long as I have this thread to vent into. <_>

 

 

I am part way into the Sunny episode. I had half-considered buying her book. But the passages Conrad is reading aloud have put me right off of the purchase.

  • Replies 782
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

Conrad has say he legit puts in 4-5 hours each week of research for each topic. I think his questions are solid and his followups show a general understanding of everything. I think he's a fantastic non-wrestler host and enjoy when he calls out obvious BS from Bruce.

 

And he has great chemistry with Tony Schiavone.

Posted

Just to add another perspective -- Conrad undoubtedly inquires about pay and money, and perhaps brings it up in some regard every week, but its hardly something he's harping on for the entire show. The point is raised, there's a back & forth and then its on with the topic.

Posted

Just to add another perspective -- Conrad undoubtedly inquires about pay and money, and perhaps brings it up in some regard every week, but its hardly something he's harping on for the entire show. The point is raised, there's a back & forth and then its on with the topic.

 

It's actually become kind of a running joke/bit, hasn't it? Same with "Was that a rib".

Posted

What else I really appreciate is something that kind of underlines this week's episode. Sometimes they do a few takes on a show if the first one wasn't good enough. Other than the Carlos Mencia incidents on Marc Maron's podcast, I haven't heard of that being done before (though that was for completely different reasons).

Posted

The problem with "how much did _____ get paid?" is that Prichard has a pretty big ethical responsibility to not discuss salaries of a company he's worked for. This responsibility even extends to confirming amounts batted around in the Observer. Conrad, being in business himself, should know this.

  • 3 weeks later...
Posted

The recent Love To Know episode is a hard listen. Lots of absolutely terrible chicken salad/box of gimmicks etc questions. And Conrad gets to be more of an asshole.

 

They're catering to their audience, I suppose. But their audience is terrible.

Posted

Honestly, I'm surprised Conrad didn't bring up Mantaur just so he can do his whole "was that a rib?" schtick. Unlike a lot of the times where Conrad has done the rib schtick, this actually did kinda feel like a rib, since you have ultra serious Jim Cornette, who hates gimmickry in his wrestling, managing a dude wearing a giant buffalo head, and since this was supposed to be about Cornette in the WWF, when else would they bring that up.

Posted

Gave this another chance with the episode on Owen, but this was clearly a mistake. 2+ hours of boredom followed by a big annoying "no we're not going to talk about his death, so there" to the audience. What a waste of time.

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

 

 

The same people comment each week that they hate the show and it's a hard listen. It's a given at this point.

Do you disagree?

I love the show. One of my favorite podcasts. I just find it puzzling that the same people bash it every week yet continue to listen. Must love punishment

Posted

 

 

The same people comment each week that they hate the show and it's a hard listen. It's a given at this point.

Do you disagree?

I love the show. One of my favorite podcasts. I just find it puzzling that the same people bash it every week yet continue to listen. Must love punishment

 

Have you noticed a change in the presentation over time? It's become a lot more schtick, box of gimmicks etc and a lot less insightful as time has gone on.

Posted

 

 

The same people comment each week that they hate the show and it's a hard listen. It's a given at this point.

Do you disagree?

I love the show. One of my favorite podcasts. I just find it puzzling that the same people bash it every week yet continue to listen. Must love punishment

 

I wish there was simple adware free place where all of the newsworthy/interesting bits from Prichard/Tony/Jericho/Ross/Bischoff/etc.'s podcasts could just posted quickly by someone in quick list form. I don't have hours and hours to listen to this stuff but I'd be curious if we learned something new about a production meeting Bischoff had with Tony about Glacier or something (I don't know). I could absolutely see people try to listen to something like Bruce's show for new information and not necessarily entertainment.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...