Matt D

Did Dave ever respond to the three pages of Gary Hart railing on him in his book?

We've been over this ground before, but since we're putting pieces together, Dustin's contract was apparently an apology for getting fired in 95.

Advantage of Denucci is that he trained Foley, right?

Really, if Bryan had managed, in that scenario, to absorb a ton of damage from the reunited Wyatts and somehow beat off both Harper AND Rowan and eliminated them both, then maybe it'd be slightly more acceptable for Wyatt to toss him.

It's funny but this, to me, feels far more precarious in the long run than just going forward with Reigns or turning him heel. We don't know what it is yet but when you start screwing with the basic logic of the universe you're presenting, you get further into death of WCW territory than just trying to push a guy and having to turn him heel because the crowd doesn't take it.

Ok, here's what to do. I got this idea from reading Gary Hart's book and his explanation for why he created the TV title and had it defended in 2/3 matches. He needed to cut two matches out of the TV taping since he was giving too much away that night. WWE Can't fill their 3 hours easily. They need to make the freaking Americas title for Bryan and have him defend it every week over 2-3 segments on Raw. He'll basically be the Million Dollar Champ or the TV champ or whatever and he can hold that belt forever against different guys and they can blow segments off, make him come off as dominant, appease the fan base on some level, and keep him out of the main event. And if his matches tank in the ratings, then that's all the ammo they need to depush him anyway. If they do well, then they have every reason to keep doing what they're doing. That's even better than giving him a year long tag title reign with Dolph. It's no lose for what Vince wants.

It might have worked (on paper) if he actually overcame them, but all he did was beat up until they decided to fight each other and then just shoved them over.

The voting idea is rubbish. What they should really do is start a kickstarter and if enough people give them money, they'll put the belt back on Daniel Bryan. $$$$

Lord Parv Salisbury(or any other stereotypical name)? I like best how you were chastising the ref like you were Gorilla Monsoon

I don't know what was more brutal: the booking of Royal Rumble 2015 or Johnny trying to defend all of it.

WWE has such a problem with pairing guys together that probably shouldn't be together, guys who can't afford to lose like Amborse and Wyatt. Feeding Kane to Bryan, especially when there's a storyline reason behind it and when they see Kane as a relatively safe worker, was not the worth thing in the world because at least they were feeding someone to Bryan instead of going even stevens.

I agree with this also - after Reigns won and he just kept celebrating to a booing crowd. Enough was enough at that point. Happy it didn't happen though. Specifically, I was in the section where elements in the crowd handed out the "Ziggler Section" and "yes" paper signs, and I wouldn't have been overly surprised if people started balling those up and throwing them.

I'm with Johnny. The Kane thing had to happen and it was a very strong way to bring him back and I think a very successful one. He was MUCH more dominantly put over Kane than he had been the year before when he was running away from him like a cowardly coward and it set him up perfectly to enter and win the Ru.....

I think at the very least it'll be interesting to see what they do with only two hours and a couple of extra days to plan.

It's not a positive sign if Stephanie sells a bunch of stock today to buy another wing on her house.

Yeah, it was 1.4 Million Global subscribers to be profitable.

This is 1 Million Global right? Just to break even, didn't they need well over 1 milion global? Wasn't the goal 1 million US? And wasn't that when the commitment was locked in. The number's going to ebb and flow during the year now.

Part of the problem in killing off Bryan is that they did the same thing they did with almost everyone in his spot before. They tossed Kane at him. It was looking like it'd be a lot like the Mysterio title reign until he got gobbled up by Lesnar. People had a year to dwell on that though, so I think he might be indestructible this time.

The best way to neuter him would be to put him in a tag team with Ziggler and put the belts on them.

There was a moment, a brief moment, maybe, where I thought there could be the throwing of things, in 2015. The reason why there wasn't, I think, was people everyone knew what was going to happen the second Bryan got eliminated. So in THAT regard, I guess it worked that everyone was a little burnt out on their anger by the end. I think everyone who was making that noise just really wanted to make sure that the company and anyone watching got the point. I'm not sure it was anger at that point so much as sending the message.

I'll agree. The chant wasn't ironic. It was just a crowd wanting desperately to be able to chant that at anyone and have a reason to be part of the show.

I'm up to the three way. I get the argument against the stretcher but that plays into the story Dylan was telling. The stretcher was a red flag that they were going to protect Brock in the loss in a way that him just being destroyed by a big elbow drop wouldn't have, not because of real logic so much of because of wrestling booking logic, if that makes sense. That match was all about playing with the fans' notions and expectations.

I thought Rusev would be way more over as a face in Philly but he drew a USA chant instead.

To be fair we've been getting those for decades.

Reigns already sort of did that: