Matt D

I watched a great Stasiak/Rose match. I didn't have time to see the last two Cesaro matches too. I'll get to them.

Ok that six man was pretty great. And they did they did sell it well in the moment at least. I'm pretty sure it was to set up Shield sweeping at the PPV but still, it was a great moment and I wasn't expecting them to present it as such. So I guess this time Johnny's right.

Rose vs Stasiak - 2/3 Falls - 11/10/79 Stasiak has a black robe, mutton chops and a mustache. He looks like something out of a bad 70s Kung Fu movie and it's great. Buddy stalls from the get go by carefully folding his shirt. We get a Heart Punch tease and Buddy takes powder. He sneaks in and starts working on the leg, with the base early on being this move that I'm not entirely sure I want to name, but it's kind of like the Indian Deathlock/Gagne Special but not quite. It's a nice move as Rose can really press in with his foot and make it look good and he also has to avoid the pin while he's holding it in. This stuff is fun as Stasiak tries to reverse but Buddy turns it into another variation, this one letting Buddy use the ropes which brings us the wrath of stunt granny. Stasiak turns it into a pin to escape but his legs are too hurt to do much else. Buddy hits a quick drop toehold and goes back to legwork. Stasiak kicks out but once again can't walk well. Buddy does a nice finesse move to try for more leg work but gets kicked off immediately. We get a cool little hope segment which is all Buddy begging off but Stan snaps on a headlock and gets punched in the leg. They end up in the ropes though leading to Stan getting one corner shot in and Buddy begging off again. Buddy's so great at making Stan fearsome with almost no effort at all. Buddy keeps going back to the leg, but misses a butt dive onto it. This is so focused. Buddy gets out of nowhere shots to the leg whenever Stan tries anything, including stopping a heart punch that way. Stasiak is selling huge. Buddy finally puts on a half crab and Stan has to tap for the first fall. Buddy gets a few cheap shots in on the way out. Second fall starts with Buddy going right to the leg. This is following from the match that Buddy won two falls and leading to a taped fist challenge (by Stasiak) on the upcoming Tuesday. They're doing a very good job working this stuff, including some great desperate kicks by Stan to get out of a leglock. It's also an a+ sell job by him anytime he gets up. I think he's punched Buddy maybe three times in the whole match but Buddy's bumping and selling and stooging is so good that it makes it seem like a force of nature is attackng him. Stasiak starts going after Budy's own leg with kicks and punches, and the punches especially look cool and different. It's really methodological and pissed off, really building to him locking in a toehold. I love that the transition was this slow steady thing and that they didn't just rush to it in a 'my turn' sort of way. Stan wrenches it until Buddy can nail Stan's leg to get out and then they start trading shots to each other's head and legs. Fun stuff leading to Buddy taking a powder to walk it off. He goes so far as to sit in an empty ringside seat. Stan is pissed off, breaking the count and letting Buddy spend some more time healing on the outside. Buddy begs off and they doa really good defensive sort of wrestling where both guys are afraid of the other getting the leg first. Stan charges in and takes over though. Stan wrenches the toehold again as the crowd chants along. I really do love Stasiak's leg punches. Buddy hits a great leg dive out of nowhere. The selling between these two is just great here. They're both dead and trying to desperately get each other's legs. Buddy misses a punch into the turnbuckle first and then goes for a kneedrop on the leg and misses. He sells HUGE and Stasiak starts to take over again, letting him get a beautiful heart punch for the second fall. Great fall. Third falls switches gears with Buddy starting over the back to set up the Robinson Backbreaker. Perfectly Logical part of Buddy's MO and his back-targeted offense is always varied and dogged and believable. Buddy keeps doing slams and throws. Stan's selling is super here, as he sells both the leg and the back whenever he gets a hope spot. Buddy goes for the Robisnon Backbreaker and Stan blocks it and then goes for the heart punch but Buddy moves and he just kills Sandy Barr with it! While Stan is concerned, Buddy rolls him up and Sandy counts a slow, slow pin. This finish was ten years before its time and this is probably my favorite singles Buddy match I've seen in this run so far.

I always kind of wished they did WM VII as Hogan vs Slaughter and Warrior vs Savage - Career, and then had the winners face off. It always bugs me for some reason that Slaughter never got to give Savage the title shot he wanted to so that being at least a possibility would be fun. Plus I bet they could probably have sold a bigger place out on the promise of Warrior vs Hogan II on top of everything else.

If they present it as a big deal then you can say that. If they don't, then you can't. Basically.

We should be looking how Taz did.

Just saw this again and I think Loss was dead on. We KNOW this match is good, but you sort of forget how good it is. It tells such a great story with Owen going cheap immediately and brazenly, with him capitalizing on the back and then the neck and then the leg at each absolutely logical and compelling opportunity while Bret fights back with these great comebacks that Owen cuts off so well. Bret sells on offense. Both guys stuff looks so good. Owen is a king at heeling it up and it's all completely believable while Bret just lays it into him when he gets the chance. They play up the fact that both guys knows each other so well and there are callbacks both within the match (the second attempt of a dragon screw for one) and to both the royal rumble with Bret's leg which was such a big part of the feud and to King of the Ring with the reversed victory roll which the move a desperate Bret had used to beat Bam Bam in the finals. Add in the backstory and the hot crowd and the lingering stakes for both wrestlers and it's just such a well-worked, well-put together match. It sort of amazes me how quickly Owen (especially with his repertoire of high flying offense) was able to work so deep and thorough and believable a heel so soon after he turned for the first time in his career, especially when he was on so big a stage.

Michaels FEELS longer to me since it's just the Jannetty 1-2 week gap breaking up his runs there, but yeah, ok. The numbers do not lie.

Was he even Longest reigning? There wasn't a hell of a lot of time between when he won it in april or may (or at least when it was televised) and Summerslam. Then he chased Tornado for the rest of the year til he got it back in December. He had the one big match with Bossman at Mania and then he loses it the following Summerslam. I loved Perfect as a kid and when I actually rewatched this stuff, it amazed me how little he actually had the belt. He just happened to have it during my key time as a kid viewer.

Was he? Top five? You've been going through the sets. Is he a top five guy for 1990? Is he better than Tenta? Than Bossman? Than Barbarian or Haku? Than Michaels/Jannetty? Or Tito? On what criteria?

I don't want this to come off as an attack, Parv, and it's not an all the time thing by any means, but a lot of times, it feels like you're arguing from a point of trying to justify your nostalgia.

I brought it up before but WCW did a great job of making Nick Patrick vs Chris Jericho seeming important since it was one of the first NWO losses. Presentation is everything.

No one works like Kofi Kingston now. He's relatively over in part due to how he works. He's vaguely marketable that way. No one says he's actually any good. I think Hennig worked the best matches he could given the instructions he was given by management and the agents. That's the credit I will give him, but he was neutered compared to his AWA run.

Yeah, well those people are jerks who haven't rewatched the matches with the sort of eye we do. He is part of a lot of people's nostalgia and was part of a pretty powerful hype engine. It doesn't mean that he wasn't one of the worst drawing Hogan opponents and has a bunch of ultimately empty matches to show for his trouble. But I'm glad he's a rousing force in the hearts of many and on a lot of ultimately meaningless lists.

Part of me feels like the portion of the crowd that would do that would chant ROH instead, but then I have no idea what 17 year olds are like anymore.

Obviously the answer is Kevin Sullivan then.

I think the guy's happy, is all.

Eh, I think Sting's basically enjoyed himself, done some good work, amazingly somehow not fully tarnished his image, and probably had a lot more flexibility than he might have had with Vince.

Actually, we should be talking about this reality show: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rollergirls

I'd like to take a moment of silence for Mark Starr here.

Have we made you watch the Garvin vs Savage ICW cage match yet? I forget.

Ok, so how much do we believe the idea that Backlund was mainly because Vince Sr wanted someone he could control?

There's no one on TV I like less than Mike (as presented on TV as a character) from American Pickers. He just has this smug, self-entitled, beady-eyed passive aggressiveness that reminds me of some people I know in real life. Someone like Dave Hester is the sort of character you love to hate. Mike (, the character of) earnestly thinks he's the hero of the piece.

I hate the Pickers show but i do think the characters are at least believable as buffoonish, self-absorbed carny assholes out to screw people.

The Pawn Stars side stories don't bug me at all. Of course they're staged but how corny they are is half the fun. There are never any serious stakes involved or anything. There's no gravitas. "Uh oh! Chumley rigged the Christmas Party!" It's like reading a Beatle Bailey comic and it breaks up the show and gives it some cohesiveness. Rigging items/transactions is a bit trickier since then you sort of wonder what the point is, but so long as the items are interesting and the experts are compelling, it's not so bad. I don't see why anyone would be offended by Chumley's adventures in bufoonery though. It's like watching a poor man's goofy short in between the newsreel.