Matt D

I do have the tag match that followed at #7. First we get Johnny's Tie-Die History lesson. Then we get a lovely rendition of the song from the Muppet Movie. Oh awesome. Parv just brings up the 60s Riddler. This is where I have to bring up that Repo Man was patterned after Goshin and completely independently, Borne watched Burgess Meredith to learn how to play Doink. Unfortunately, they never teamed. I totally bought Murdoch in 91 when I was 10, btw. That was surprising to hear from Will. I LOVE the splash transition to lead to the FIP in this match. He misses it So much (even in this match) so when he hits it, it is HUGE. Brian Blair is my personal Mike Rotundo. Guy bores the hell out of me. Also, I really think Brunzell is the find of the set, even more so than Blackwell, because a lot of people didn't have an opinion one way or the other of Blackwell, but everyone discounted Brunzell.

http://slam.canoe.ca/Slam/Wrestling/2011/07/12/18409521.html More than you ever wanted to know about Steve O. Buck vs Regal is 147 for me. Frigging Regal. Thanks Will. I can't wait til you guys have to suffer through that. The long shine in the tag worked for me because they did it well, because the fip on Steve O was even longer, and mainly because it was on Patera and not Blackwell. I had that tag as the 8 on the disc, but that might have been a structure thing. I'll look at it again probably. I remember Saito vs Hogan being a nice novelty, really energetic and a good performance by Saito as a chickenshit, but not much of a match. I have it at the very high end of my bottom 25. I'm glad that the set up was included though. Saito's one of the real stars of the first half of the set, I think. I can't get behind asshole Hogan the asshole like you can. It was superfluous at this point. I think if some of the things he did were switched around a bit, it would have worked better. He led with the leg drop and then kept doing other things aimlessly. Let's see if you guys can convince me of the greatness of Bock vs Wahoo, because right now it's sitting at my tentative #45. I have Wahoo vs Hennig from 12/27/87 at #18, so it won't even be my #1 Wahoo match on the set. It's definitely hard to keep the Tims apart. Tim Evans. Tim Livingston. Tim Cooke. Tim Noel. But Evans is easy to remember since he's the FCW guy. "Are you in your 60s?" There are some moments in the Bock vs Wahoo match I can get absolutely get behind. The Chair shots by Bock. The sleeper counter. Bock's bumping around and general desperation. The finish. I'm fine with all the offense being chops and punches. It is absolutely spectacle. 100% It was a war. It's just not my thing. One guy beating on another in the most violent brutal way possible doesn't excite me. Bock's responses and reaction are the entirety of this match to me. And that I can get behind completely. It's enough to push it up into my top 50 and that is saying something, but it only gets so far. I'm not saying Wahoo doesn't bring something, because of course he does. It's just that what he brings isn't that interesting to me. A lot of it feels just like really gritty violence for the sake of violence. It's almost like watching a spotfest, except for instead of crazy moves (and a real master responding to them), you just get brutal stiff strikes. Glad you guys had so much fun watching it though.

Starting now. As with last time. I will liveblog this right here, since no one demanded it. I can't wait to hear Parv/Johnny Sorrow interaction. Also, I hate calling him Parv when VON KRAMER is right there. "We will help you get real perspective on Minneapolis in 1983, our british brother." "Man, that looks like where Mad Dog cooks meth." It's funny when Johnny takes over due to baby crying and phones ringer and the entire feel of the podcast shifts. It turns into a cable access show with a lot of tie-die. As far as shout outs go, that was pretty weak. And now I feel like I need to post on that Who are you? PWO note to clear out my geographic background. Though I suppose there's not much difference between Boston and New Jersey when you're languishing in Texas. Tim is a very soft-spoken gent.

I was totally ready to watch Hogan/Hansen vs Backlund/Inoki tonight. If I knew someone was going to make this note, I would have.

Grimmas takes us as far away as last week's pick as possible. Well, it's still a tag setting. Survivor Series was my favorite PPV as a kid mainly for two reasons. One is that it's like an alternate reality where moves that normally wouldn't win a match could. It's a little more exciting and even realistic because we're not longer stuck in a finisher paradigm. Suddenly a well placed kick or knee drop or flying body press can win a fall. The second reason is that you get interactions you wouldn't normally see. For instance, Warrior with the Rockers and Neidhart. Even Neidhart with the Rockers has a certain novelty that's cool. And though they were in the same faction for the better part of a year, you don't really see Haku and Arn team up like this often. 1989 WWF is not 1991-2 WCW with all the random Dangerous Alliance tags. Obviously we have Heenan replacing Tully here due to a failed drug test, one that changed wrestling. Without that, Arn and Tully would have come back into the NWA together, with a much higher salary for Arn and less friction for Flair and 1990 would have looked very different. Could you imagine face Tully vs J-Tex? I think heel Tully would have been a great foil for Lex and Sting too, but that's just speculation. What it means here is that we get Heenan directly in the match in one of his last big in ring performances (maybe the last. I'm not sure when the weasel suit matches vs Warrior hit). They get Andre out quickly, really before the match even begins. I'm not sure if he just didn't want to work or if he was that physically spent. He has a great match in December vs Demolition and the SNME match vs Warrior shortly before has him doing a lot of stuff and taking a lot of stuff, so it's not like he couldn't go in his own broken down giant way in late 89. It changes the dynamic of the match, though. Neidhart and the Rockers vs Arn and Haku is a super fast affair, at sometimes a downright sprint, with a lot of really nice looking exchanges. Exciting stuff and I'm glad I saw it. You forget how Haku could go given the gimmick he'd have a few years later. You also forget how much experience he had as a tag worker. He and Arn make a great little unit. And Warrior is great on the apron. I love him in the Bulldogs vs Demolition + Fuji match as a cheerleader on the outside and he's just as good here. There are points I think he's going to kill Michaels by pushing him off the top rope without Michaels being ready for it. I don't feel that this is true with every Survivor Series match, but this one definitely has different dynamics as guys leave the match, all the way til the end when you get stooging Arn + desperate Heenan vs the Warrior two on one. And then it ends with such a great weasel on the run performance by Heenan and a really slimy smiling bully act(?) by Warrior which the fans do eat up. It's interesting. You think that if this match had Tully and Andre in a bigger role, it'd be better, but I'm not sure it could have accomplished what it set out to do better even with two such talented wrestlers playing a bigger role.

Two hours of what Hudson thinks about Mark Henry.

Tully Blanchard vs Ultimate Warrior (Survivor Series Showdown, 1989) I was watching some things to prep for the Microscope Match of the Week this week and this was one. I don't have a ton to say about it but I will say that Tully is really masterful in all the ways he gets back on offense, if even for a few seconds. Getting his feet up, moving out of the way, getting a cheap shot in, using the distracted ref. His entire offense for the match is basically made up of what would normally be transitions and it creates an overall theme that is pretty cool. It's definitely not much of a match though.

I think you're getting Periscope and Microscope confused. The microscope is not a mobile wrestling watching submarine.

I look forward to listening and babbling here about it on Monday.

I had Savage and Warrior as a 9 year old. What? I did.

There is a pretty good Martel shoot out there.

Pride

That set needs more Jack Hart.

http://www.cagesideseats.com/2011/11/22/25...main-event-push it's more even than I said, but still.

What about that Cageside Seats post last year? The one where 90% of a ton of comments were fervently anti henry.

Is there other stuff the guy has that you don't?

With me inserting mine between the two JCPs, we'd have 2/10/13: 11/23/1989 WWF Survivor Series Elimination Match: The Ultimate Warriors (Ultimate Warrior/Jim Neidhart/Rockers) vs. The Heenan Family (Andre the Giant/Haku/Arn Anderson/Bobby Heenan) (Grimmas) 2/17/13: Stan Hansen v. Carlos Colon - Bullrope match WWC (Dylan) 2/24/13: The Fantastics vs. Eddie Gilbert and Ron Simmons - Clash 4 (JvK) 3/3/13: Funks vs Can Am Connection: 11/22/86 (Me) 3/10/13: Murdoch and Koloff vs. Windham and Garvin - 3/14/87 (Mike Campbell) 3/17/13: Chicky Starr vs. Invader III (Will) Which means we have an All Japan - WWF - PR - JCP - All Japan - JCP - PR cycle here. I think that's not so bad and it takes us into Mid March.

What's the deal with Grundy?

There really is something to that. The Bossman turn, the end of the Savage/Dusty feud, Dustin's debut, the Undertaker's debut, Perfect getting the belt back, one of Warrior's biggest title defenses.

No, no. that's what brickhithead would think seeing the first match and knowing NOTHING about the AWA. I know I'm no Dave Musgrave or Jack Benny here but come on.

"Why is this hairy dickhead fighting this giant normal sized hairy dwarf?"

I am going to relook at a few of these matches because of this. I know I put that Hogan vs Bock was everything I wanted from the two.

You guys should watch A Night at the Opera next. Screw Bock vs Wahoo.

On the assumption that the match order is correct (and i never doubted it. Can we get Kevin to confirm?), it makes sense to me that the crowd would be sort of dead for the Martel match. I'd be burnt out too. To me, it was a great early use of the King of the Hill (in Bock was so flustered by Martel's barrage that he HAD to toss him out), the crazy test of strength of doom, and the ending was fun since Martel didn't seem to know how to put him away so Bock just held on til he made a mistake. That said, Bockwinkel and Martel have 3 matches together that are better yet to come on the set, including my working #4, #5, and #16, while this one doesn't make my working top 50. The Six Man is my working #24 and the (so-called) Taped Fist match is my working #41. In case anyone cares.

Johnny fucking up the Color Commentary replay was great. To be fair, my ratings when i went through back in July or whenever were 1. Ken Patera, Jesse Ventura & Bobby Heenan vs. Hulk Hogan & High Flyers (3/13/83) 2. Crusher Blackwell & Sheik Adnan Kaissey vs. Baron Von Raschke & Mad Dog Vachon (Taped Fist Match) (3/13/83) 3. Nick Bockwinkel vs. Rick Martel (3/13/83) 4. Nick Bockwinkel vs. Hulk Hogan (4/24/83) 5. Ken Patera & Jesse Ventura vs. Hulk Hogan & Mad Dog Vachon (1/16/83) 6. Crusher Blackwell & Sheik Adnan Kaissey vs. Verne Gagne & Mad Dog Vachon (4/24/83) 7. Adrian Adonis vs. Hulk Hogan (10/17/82) which give or take SOME shifting I'm not far off a lot of you guys. It makes sense to me that I pushed Martel a little higher and the Verne match a little lower. So it might just be these matches.