Kronos Posted March 12, 2014 Report Share Posted March 12, 2014 This thread is wicked entertaining. I can certainly empathize with those who list HHH among the main-event guys. I can't stand him on the mic, and he does have a tendency to dominate /overstretch the shows he's on. Still, I could think of some matches from him that I have enjoyed over the years. Having not seen these apparently really good 2012-13 years, I have to go with Kane no question. No "name" wrestler that I have ever watched makes my brain to turn mush from boredom when he's on the screen. And his promos are even woirse. Good for Jacobs making a career and working clean and having respect and all that. But at what cost to the viewer? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Johnny Sorrow Posted March 12, 2014 Report Share Posted March 12, 2014 On 3/12/2014 at 5:23 AM, Kronos said: But at what cost to the viewer? None, unless you bought a Kane toy or a PPV because of him. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kronos Posted March 12, 2014 Report Share Posted March 12, 2014 On 3/12/2014 at 5:43 AM, Johnny Sorrow said: On 3/12/2014 at 5:23 AM, Kronos said: But at what cost to the viewer? None, unless you bought a Kane toy or a PPV because of him. Sadness. Wasted time. Bad dreams about hopelessness. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
El-P Posted March 21, 2014 Report Share Posted March 21, 2014 The Network thread just reminded me of the existence of Steve Blackman. Man, WWF has so many dull and useless workers in the late 90's. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.