Jump to content
Pro Wrestling Only

Recommended Posts

Posted

This thread is wicked entertaining. I can certainly empathize with those who list HHH among the main-event guys. I can't stand him on the mic, and he does have a tendency to dominate /overstretch the shows he's on. Still, I could think of some matches from him that I have enjoyed over the years.

 

Having not seen these apparently really good 2012-13 years, I have to go with Kane no question. No "name" wrestler that I have ever watched makes my brain to turn mush from boredom when he's on the screen. And his promos are even woirse. Good for Jacobs making a career and working clean and having respect and all that. But at what cost to the viewer?

  • Replies 228
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

 

But at what cost to the viewer?

None, unless you bought a Kane toy or a PPV because of him.

 

 

Sadness. Wasted time. Bad dreams about hopelessness.

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

The Network thread just reminded me of the existence of Steve Blackman. Man, WWF has so many dull and useless workers in the late 90's.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...