Jump to content
Pro Wrestling Only

WWE TV 01/28 - 02/03 Brazil is covered in mud and blood


Recommended Posts

Posted

Big Show/Rock/HHH/Foley is one of the biggest matches of its eras? Kane/UT/Austin was pretty big. You could argue that Shamrock/Mankind/Rock helped drive that PPV too. DPP vs Hogan vs Sting vs Flair maybe?

  • Replies 173
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
2 minutes ago, Matt D said:

Big Show/Rock/HHH/Foley is one of the biggest matches of its eras? Kane/UT/Austin was pretty big. You could argue that Shamrock/Mankind/Rock helped drive that PPV too. DPP vs Hogan vs Sting vs Flair maybe?

I can't remember any of those? Oh, first one is WM during the attitude era. I doubt that match was bigger than if they just did Triple H-Rock.

Posted
5 minutes ago, Grimmas said:

It was well remembered because people thought it was a great match, but it wasn't a big deal in a drawing sense.

It did better than 18 and 19.

I did a quick glance at the numbers and they don't seem to effect buyrates one way or the other. Though 4 corners matches seem to have a positive impact on shows from a very brief glance.

Posted
11 minutes ago, Grimmas said:

I can't remember any of those? Oh, first one is WM during the attitude era. I doubt that match was bigger than if they just did Triple H-Rock.

I honestly, 100% believe that with the corner they backed themselves into this year (through things their fault and things not their fault), the best Raw main event they can possibly put on is a Brock vs Rollins vs Braun vs Balor match.

Posted

You can't really judge those in terms of drawing now. Wrestlemania, Rumble and Summerslam sell on their names alone. They typically draw shit for their live shows minus those 3.

Posted
24 minutes ago, KawadaSmile said:

Now that you mentioned it, Joe vs Lesnar vs Roman vs Strowman seemed to do pretty well, at least it was very well received in terms of star ratings and the such. 

Rollins vs Cena vs Brock too. 

Posted

That WWE have released a statement announcing Dean Ambrose is leaving is really really odd. I'm pretty sure they've never done that before. Makes me suspicious it's some elaborate work.

Posted
6 minutes ago, Kadaveri said:

That WWE have released a statement announcing Dean Ambrose is leaving is really really odd. I'm pretty sure they've never done that before. Makes me suspicious it's some elaborate work.

Also that Wade Keller broke the story.  When was the last time that happened?  Feels like they are working the sheets.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...