Jump to content
Pro Wrestling Only

Dave Meltzer stuff


Loss

Recommended Posts

Dave did make a good point that if you showed someone who never watched All Japan in the 90s a clip of one of those comedy matches with old Baba they'd probably think it was the worst promotion ever. Cornette making opinions of PWG over a 10 second Chuck Taylor clip is the same concept.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 9.6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

He also wore a straitjacket inside a cage at ringside, attacked wrestlers while dressed in drag, wore a mask after he had his head shaved, threw fireballs, hit a woman in the stomach with a tennis racket repeatedly, tarred and feathered a top babyface, wrestled a ninja turtle, poured alcohol down the throat of a sober alcoholic, and ran his own militia. It was more sensationalist than 90% of wrestling today. And it was awesome.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There's a difference between working regular comedy spots and doing an invisible grenade spot. The comedy spots Cornette did that were described here aren't of the "This is all obvious make believe" variety like the stupid Chuck Taylor thing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I should probably put this here, too...

 

I wrote something for Deadspin about how Dave's star ratings became a big deal and the Okada-Omega ratings are (probably) not him trolling: http://deadspin.com/rating-pro-wrestlings-new-best-match-ever-is-way-more-1796026082

 

As for the Cornette stuff: Based on my own interactions with him, I don't think any of this stuff is 100% work. And goc is right, the invisible grenade doesn't even have close to the internal logic of even DDT's most ridiculous comedy spots. DDT is a particular universe with ridiculous rules. PWG has always had an offbeat comedy presence, but the invisible grenade literally exists for no reason other than Chuck Taylor to point and laugh at how he gets to play wrestler. He's not a conjurer, and he's not a face messing with a heel then making fun of his reaction. It doesn't have its own logic. It's *just* "haha, invisible grenade."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Even if you think the grenade spot is stupid which is kind of is, the idea that you are basing someone's career off of that is embarrassing. Cornette makes it seems like Chuck Taylor is some backyarder who gets booked to PWG because nobody in the company cares about what wrestling looks like. Chuck Taylor has been wrestling for at least 10 years. Maybe even longer than the Bucks themselves. He has been involved in a number of non comedy stuff. His whole 'Dustin' character in EVOLVE was largely based on him thinking that Gabe and anybody in WWN Live respects him.

Saying that Chuck Taylor is garbage based on a clip is like saying Kenny Omega is a terrible wrestler because of his DDT stuff which plenty of people like Cornette does. Based on that logic, Kane is terrible because of the Christmas Creature in Memphis and Okada is terrible because of his TNA stuff.

 

Also the idea that the mummy stuff is different than the grenade spot is because of the "This is all obvious make believe" argument really makes old wrestling fans look like morons. Have a hard time believe that fans in Smoky Mountain over the age of 10 were so dense that they actually thought a mummy was wrestling. They were in on the joke too

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Mummy wasn't Corny's doing. The financial backer of SMW wanted a mummy because he fan a fan of the old wrestling mummy when he was a kid. It turned into a vehicule for James Mitchell to say the most obscene stuff on a southern TV, so it was fine with me. The whole dust flying off was great too. A wrestling mummy is always great. Even when it's called a Yetay.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh I am not saying that the Prince Kharis thing was bad. Okay it was actually bad but I find it enjoyable as well. But to act like what Chuck Taylor once every 4 or 5 months is destroying the realism of wrestling is laughable.

 

It goes back to the bigger point of how the "smartest man in wrestling" can be easily trolled. Now is he being easily trolled because he sees a bigger picture in this for himself that is my argument. I believe most of this stuff is just him trying to stay relevant in today's wrestling. Problem is guys know it and they are just letting him playing the Ole "get off my lawn" guy by himself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know Chuck Taylor, so no comment on that from me. A fake exploding grenade spot does sound funny as shit in a comedy match context though. Then again, I like Joey Ryan's dick spot.

 

I'll say this, those completely absurd yet amusing spots are nowhere as idiotic and annoying as say, the fucking Worm.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the argument of “Dave doesn’t take his star ratings seriously anymore so nobody else should” is really flawed. I think he very clearly does still take them seriously. He often utilizes his star ratings as metrics to support his arguments on particular wrestlers/promotions/periods. He discusses and defends his ratings in the newsletter, on the audio shows, and on Twitter. As an example, in this past week’s issue with the Omega/Okada rating, he devotes several sentences to explaining why he gave a Jeff Cobb/Matt Riddle match from PROGRESS **** ¼ instead of the **** ½ that his readers who saw it live gave it. You don’t explain a ¼ rating difference if the ratings aren’t intended to be taken seriously. He continues to devote space in the Observer and elsewhere to his star ratings. At the most basic level, why continue to devote thought and time to star ratings if they don’t matter? That would say more about Meltzer than it would any of his readers. Not sure how you can look at all of that and conclude that Dave doesn’t take his star ratings seriously, at least to some level. He clearly puts stock in them.

 

Having said that, I strongly suspect Dave wouldn’t use the “not meant to be taken seriously” argument on his own. I think that’s strictly an argument that others have levied on his behalf. I think he would – and has – argued that they aren’t gospel and there is not a science behind it, for example that the difference between a **** ¾ and ***** match is a gut feeling (the difference between having to think about whether a match was 5 and immediately knowing it is). There’s a difference between understanding the limits of the rating’s value and not taking the ratings seriously.

 

I guess what I am trying to say is that “don’t take his ratings seriously because he doesn’t take them seriously” is a cop out. If the second part of that sentence is true, then Dave should stop giving out star ratings. That would be the issue, rather than blaming his readers for taking the ratings at face value.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Mummy wasn't Corny's doing. The financial backer of SMW wanted a mummy because he fan a fan of the old wrestling mummy when he was a kid. It turned into a vehicule for James Mitchell to say the most obscene stuff on a southern TV, so it was fine with me. The whole dust flying off was great too. A wrestling mummy is always great. Even when it's called a Yetay.

 

It's funny, because in his 1994 shoot interview during SMW Fan Week, he keeps going on about how there was a mummy in Louisville when he was a kid, and "I love the fucking mummy!"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Eh. Two minutes after the finger thing, Dirty White Boy is out and completely no-selling it ("You expect us to believe that this big piece of toilet paper is 3000 years old?!"). The sand in the finger can be faked just as easily in storyline as it obviously was in real life.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Once the first European tournament wrestler who couldn't really cut it figured out he would be booked because of his comedic antics (escape spots!!!) or because of he was lovable hometown hero the business was doomed in that regard. That probably happened in one of the first ten tournaments which were ever held.

I love how some (IIRC 1901'ish) Vienna tournament coverage explicitly stated that because the normal, charismatic ring announcer/mc was missing one day a full fledged riot couldn't be prevented, unlike the other days when they could be calmed down by said MC. Wrestling has always been wrestling and will always be wrestling

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Dave's thoughts on the GOAT debate:

 

As far as greatest of all-time, I think the best description is that Flair was the greatest of his time on more different days than anyone else ever was.

Shawn is in the discussion but as a contemporary of Kobashi and seeing both, I can't think of them as even close. Kobashi had more of a star aura, his best matches were better than Shawn's to the point you can't even make a comparison (some of that is his opponents were better but not all of that), his work was more real looking and matches felt more real, he got more crowd reaction, he had more presence, he was far better known in his culture. Some will saw Misawa was better than both and he was more over than both and had more great matches than both, but Misawa was pushed as the star of the promotion in a way Shawn & Kobashi never were. Kobashi's late surge was far superior to Shawn's. He was a far bigger drawing card to the point you can't even compare them in that category. The only thing in Shawn's favor is that he was smarter in that he didn't work as hard so he lasted longer and is physically in better shape today.

I really think any Shawn as the greatest of all-time is a heavily time biased period of a childhood and even more, a WWE viewpoint not recognizing WWE was never the place where the best in the world were in his career.

Still, Shawn was more physically talented than Misawa or Flair, but even there, the physical talent, he was no better than Kobashi, and Kobashi was 60 pounds heavier. Kobashi was hurt by working so much harder than anyone that his body broke down.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not going to pick on Dave with all he's going through. But he wounded me today. I threw in Negro Casas as someone who deserves to be in this GOAT conversation with Flair, Michaels, Kobashi, Toyota and the usual suspects. Dave's response was that Negro was great in the 80s and as he got old but he phoned it in during the 90s. Negro Casas! His peak 90s years! That's like saying Misawa was great in the 80s and when he was older but not so much in the 90s. I didn't think Dave could hurt me more than when he said he didn't think much of Dundee as a worker but here we are.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...