sek69

Gary Hart didn't come up with "Cody Rhodes" though. If I become a wrestler and decide to call myself Sek Hogan, it doesn't mean WWE can't copyright my name because Hulk Hogan was around 40 years ago.

Because people signed to NXT deals tend to not get paid shit unless they're a Balor or Joe and able to make their own deals.

I hope Da Mack gets signed to either NXT or to fill the Cruiserweight roster on Raw. His unique look with his spider limbs with his charisma seems tailor made for WWE. I just hope they resist the urge to make him "black Alex Wright" just because he's German. Also seeing "Hot & Spicy" on his tights made me wish Christopher Daniels was available to have Curry Man be his tag partner.

So apparently it was reported that the plan for Roman's return is to go right back to pushing him as top babyface. Between that and having someone other than Bayley as Sasha's mystery partner, that could spell quite the fan backlash on the PPV on Sunday.

Pretty sure they did it for the Rock so he would use the name in movies. Also those are two guys Vince can be most assured of (after Hunter I guess) that they won't ever try to work for a rival wrestling company.

Alvarez was mentioning on Twitter that the final details were hammered out minutes before the pre show started.

Considering the whole point of this is to make Smackdown more appealing to USA, I suspect Grimmas is going to be very happy.

I don't think it's so much the wrestlers themselves as much as WWE seemingly achieving their goal of making everyone under contract as bland as possible. Everyone has to use the same heavy handed non-human sounding verbiage and work the same style. It takes someone with ridiculous levels of charisma like Nakamura or Enzo to overcome that, so 99% of your roster comes off as interchangeable boring guys.

WWE is in a tough place, because if they don't enforce the trademark with Cody they set a precedent they don't want, and if they do enforce it they're seen as being dicks to the son of a beloved employee.

Is it me or does it seem like Mick Foley was a last minute fill in for someone else they couldn't close the deal on? It makes no sense for Steph to pick him since she's made it clear in promos she doesn't care what the fans think and that people who pander to them are stupid. From that to making "Mr. Hometown Cheap Pop" her GM is baffling unless its either factoring in as a plotline to Foley's network show or just her doing an insider rib picking the guy the internet says her husband hates (and don't pretend they aren't that petty to do something like that either).

I believe he did at some point in OVW.

Most of the wrestler deaths from the 80s were due to rampant cocaine use taking its toll on hearts already pushed to the max by steroid inflated bodies. Most of the 2000s wrestler deaths came from enlarged hearts due to the PED of choice switching to HGH. The only exception really were the ECW guys who were a combination of a non stop party lifestyle combined with the punishment they took. Of course a lot of the WWE policy is largely PR, and there's clearly guys not being tested and/or skirting the system, but there have been some positive aspects as well. Bottom line, Vince doesn't want guys dying on his watch, which despite it being largely a CYA measure is a good thing for the guys involved.

If they trademarked it, which all accounts seem to suggest they did in 2009, they kind of have to in order to protect their trademarks. Dusty and Dustin worked under the Rhodes name prior to WWF/WWE but Cody never did. They trademarked "Cody Rhodes" like they would any other person coming up through developmental. Also this is why second/third generation guys are never allowed to use their family names anymore.

This. Coming to the ring dressed like Mexican Magic Mike is not doing him any favors.

WWE kind of has to do something. It's too big a story for them to ignore it, especially since they just had another top guy pop less than a month ago. Their publicly stated policy says they have to do something, and they can't pretend they don't know about it. I mean, yeah they could do nothing, but WWE in 2016 is to phobic of bad PR to do that. It's more likely they wait for the hearing to see what exactly it was he popped for, and if it's a PED and not something WWE wouldn't test for like cold medicine they'll issue a 30 day suspension retroactive to the failure date so he can be back for SummerSlam.

I don't often pine for the old school mentality, but stuff like that makes me wish someone like Asuka would deal out some Bill Watts justice to people like that.

They can do what they did for Roman and have the 30 days start from the time of the test (June 28) so the 30 days would be up by SummerSlam.

Brock got popped by USADA, so now we see if WWE counts it as a Wellness Failure which they technically should.

The exchange between Shane and Steph where Triple H was mentioned leads me to believe she will pick Bryan as her GM as a suck up to the crowd, Shane will counter by picking Hunter, then Vince will pull the "swerve" and switch them. There was also something with the app publishing then quickly deleting a story about the Yes Movement being welcomed to Smackdown which makes me think he's the plan there.

I'm not saying you guys are wrong but it still seems incredibly nitpicky.

It's bad enough they have all these writers and end up copying ideas from other companies, but to do it within days of the original ideas comes off as bush league. Especially when their versions of both were far inferior.

They had Biff Busick work under his real name on TV for a few weeks then repackaged him as Oney Baloney or whatever his new wacky name is.

This might be proof of Time Traveling Simon Gotch.

I think it really gets undersold how much Alexia Bliss has improved as a heel. I remember when she first debuted with her fairy gimmick and blue hair I couldn't see how she could be taken seriously. Now she's great mean mugging fans and having tantrums at the referees, My only issue with her now is sometimes she's too cartoonish with her Angry Video Game Nerd scowl,

To be fair (and I can't believe I'm saying that in regards to Russo) is that the eventual pitfall of all bookers is falling in the trap of "this worked really well once, so let's never deviate from it". It's just that most bookers have a longer period of good stuff to counterbalance and/or negate the bad.