Jump to content
Pro Wrestling Only

WWE TV 4/20-4/26 time for the Ingovernables de Titan Sports to reign supreme


sek69

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 85
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

No, but given Kairi's history of concussions (TLC anyone?), Nia could've given her another one. And God knows what would've happened next for Kairi afterwards if Vince thought she was too injury prone. They either need to rein Nia in or cut her loose because she's doing the exact same thing she accused Ronda Rousey of.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, C.S. said:

Is there actually any confirmation that Nia's opponent was injured in the match? The spot looked nasty, sure, but that doesn't necessarily mean anything in and of itself.

Maybe not, but it was a clear botch and if Kairi is not hurt, that's pure luck. There's also a video going around Twitter where Kairi audibly says she is not ready/set up but Nia gives her the move anyway. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In response to the anonymous accusations filed with the Orange County Board of Directors today and read for the public record, World Wrestling Entertainment issued the following statement to PWInsider:

"These accusations aren’t true. Employees know they can confidentially go to Human Resources, not the public. Notwithstanding the appropriate protocol, no one would be fired if they were uncomfortable with their surroundings. We’ve made accommodations for individuals upon request."

(from https://www.pwinsider.com/ViewArticle.php?id=135788)

-------------------

The WWE's response is so cartoonishly evil it's funny. Like, I can't read it without imagining Conan O'Brien doing it in a sarcastic, mocking tone with wild eyes. 

Even if you take it at face value, it is an awful quote. "Employees know they can confidentially go to Human Resources" - Uh, yeah, and they know that they will possibly lose their job or be strong-armed into continuing to report to work. That's why they made it a public comment. That sentence doesn't their case at all. Neither does "Notwithstanding the appropriate protocol," which reads like victim-blaming. 

Also, kinda hard to say nobody would be fired for criticizing or going against the company's wishes after the biggest day of layoffs in what? A decade or two? Ever?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...