Jump to content
Pro Wrestling Only

dawho5

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    4960

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by dawho5

  1. dawho5
    This match is great for so many reasons. It plays off of a lot of stuff that has led up to it. It is at Korakuen and Kikuchi is in it. Kikuchi actually gets to look good on offense for a few brief stretches, despite the whiffed diving headbutt. There's a lot of stuff in here that is a callback to things that have happened in the months prior. Oh, and Kawada slamming Taue down on the piece of railing Misawa and Kikuchi took out and laid on the floor is incredible. It's not a 10/90 or 4/91 level awesome 6-man, but it's right up there behind them.
  2. dawho5
    Taue's offense in the full version is very un-Taue in nature. Unless there was a clip I missed it came in at about 8 minutes.
  3. dawho5
    Man, I am two behind. That Flair promo on Hogan from 99 was absolutely amazing. Loving these, keep up the good work.
  4. dawho5
    This Parv vs. Pete feud better live up to all of this hype. Also, I think Steven has to be on the second one to avoid the asterisk. Can't have Martin calling himself the undisputed champ when it is, in fact, disputed. Great stuff though. I look forward to the encyclopedia guys being on there and seeing what kind of ridiculously obscure questions Johnny will come up with for them.
  5. dawho5
    What happened to the New Year's resolution Johnny? I'd be disappointed if it wasn't funny stuff.
  6. dawho5
    Don't get me wrong, I'm just asking questions. I tend to cherrypick matches a lot myself so I completely understand. I just know that when I have watched all the lead-ins I tend to enjoy the match more for it in a well-booked feud. I was just wondering if you saw any difference between cherrypicking the present and the past. The rest was just stuff that popped into my head as I was typing that up.
  7. dawho5
    Okay, here's a question for you then just for the sake of discussion. IF you separate the wrestling from the booking and watch for the good matches, what is the difference between that and watching a match from the past with little to no context? Isn't it a very similar thing once you think about it? And another question. How can you have truly great wrestling matches without context derived from a well-booked feud? What makes matches great is often something more than just the work in the ring. It's the meaning of what's going on in the ring as it relates to the feud between the workers. Does the lack of a consistent, well-crafted narrative outside of the matches in a vacuum have an impact on the matches themselves? Which leads me to yet another question. Is this what Vince means by "sports entertainment"? Is that a part of his disconnect from what he would call "pro wrestling"? It's obvious that there are aspects of the older styles that he doesn't care for and has done away with. Or it could be just a side effect of the philosophy that the brand is bigger than any of the stars that work within it.
  8. dawho5
    Didn't Lanny work one match as the fake Jericho during the Malenko feud? A bit off-topic, but I would swear he did.
  9. dawho5
    Kikuchi was big in the early 90s as the whipping boy for team Misawa. He was essentially THE face-in-peril and you have to realize that guys get over big in Japan on showing spirit. Which happens to be a huge strength of Kikuchi's along with selling. I have to think you'll eventually at least like Kobashi's offense. The suplexes will probably win you over even if the crying doesn't. I am one of those few who is very down on Kobashi's later career work with the exception of certain matches. I almost hate you for being down on Kawada. But I will forgive. It seems like you are skipping an important match in 8/92 Misawa vs. Hansen. It's one of the matches that cements Misawa as a force to be reckoned with. Also, one of Hansen's few really great matches with Misawa. Great listen guys, keep up the good work.
  10. dawho5
    Just rewatched this and it is only the second match of 1990 that had me going all the way through. Everything is sharp, well-placed and brutal. Only thing that comes close to this so far in 90 is Fuchi vs. Kikuchi as a total package. The Misawa vs. Jumbo rematch on 9/1 has an incredible finishing run to go with the incredible story of Jumbo's fight to remain on top, but the lulls drop it just below this one. The wrestlers and the crowd were on fire from the get-go and it's a great, great watch.
  11. dawho5
    I understand not wanting to rip the guy off, but Rocky Raymond is absolutely glorious. Only real problem is that his act would be hard to top.
  12. dawho5
    This match actually sets up the 8/92 TC match well. I know the 92 match is about a real Misawa injury at the time, but it's also sweet revenge for Misawa in getting a win with an elbow after having that arm worked. As far as this match in full, I can't say a whole lot positive about it. It's not that it's a bad match. Just that you expect more from the pairing. I have this feeling as I go through the 90s again that's going to be the case with these two.
  13. dawho5
    This is a match where context makes all the difference between really good/almost great and classic. The opening was great at establishing the nature of the rivalry. The ending was incredible for how it cemented Misawa as THE new star in AJPW. The middle had a few botches and didn't really go anywhere. The test of strength mentioned above was far more glaring than the Jumbo top rope mistake. Either it was some kind of miscommunication or Misawa was out of position, but Jumbo did a sort of short knee off the top to a very close Misawa. Then Jumbo tries going for a tigerdriver only to get backdropped out and works his way back to the top where Misawa cuts him off, Jumbo elbows him off the top and then hits the jump knee off the top spot the way he usually does. It was something you had to really pay attention to catch because they covered so well for it, but it is there. This is an incredible match for how much Jumbo was willing to give and how Misawa really came through in a tough spot. And smiled...I'm guessing you could count the times you saw that on one hand with some fingers left.
  14. dawho5
    That much I can understand. I just don't care for the idea of trying to put numbers to a bunch of categories, no matter how much thought is put into it, to sum up how a wrestler performs. It seems just as reductive as "great matches" while covering different ground for guys like DiBiase or Masanobu Fuchi. They are both clearly great ring generals who any promotion would be happy to have around, but were only involved in a handful of great matches with the majority of their career spent doing unimportant things. Having some way of qualifying their credentials seems like a worthwhile idea, but I look at wrestling as something better felt than analyzed and put in order. So the idea of finding a scientific way to fit the less mainstream candidates into the top 100 just doesn't appeal to me.
  15. dawho5
    Again, it seems like an overly elaborate way of approaching a simple problem, Parv. DiBiase in the WWF wasn't supposed to come across as a great wrestler. I'd guess that most who have seen any of his pre-WWF work would agree he's very good at least and worthy of a top 100 pick. But once he gets the "Million Dollar Man" gimmick, essentially a spoiled brat rich kid but all grown up, DiBiase had to wrestle his matches a little differently. If he goes out and has great matches consistently and drags rookies and stiffs to career heights how does that play into his gimmick? There are times when it made for great vignettes and character work, but it put a lot of limitations on what DiBiase was going to be able to do in the ring. Otherwise he'd have been doing a long-term J.J. Dillon or Scotty Flamingo.
  16. dawho5
    Wow, that's a busy year of updates for you. First was a fun read and the promos were sweet. Now I suppose I have to dive into the second.
  17. dawho5
    I have to question whether or not the homogenization of styles has had the effect of possibly making matches seem less memorable than they used to. You look at 10-15 years ago and there was a huge difference between a match in Japan, a match in WCW, a match in WWF and a match in Mexico. Now you see a lot of the same tropes as far as in-ring action at the very least in the WWE and New Japan (which are the two big promotions now). Yes there are differences, but less than there were in the past as guys watch a bunch of footage and add moves/aspects they like from somewhere else into their style. I'm not saying it lowers the quality of matches, but it might make individual matches seem less memorable due to their similarity to a lot of other matches you see during the year. I would agree that it is much easier to find great matches in the past. You get to skip all the stuff that doesn't appeal to you or doesn't matter or just plain doesn't work.
  18. dawho5
    I'm in the same camp as Loss and goc, I really love that match. I don't agree that it should have been number 1 ahead of Magnum/Tully on the Starrcade set, but I would have had it at 2 for sure.
  19. dawho5
    I've seen either highly positive or highly negative reactions to that match. It seems like now it's about 50/50 between the 2. Could be initial reaction was more positive?
  20. dawho5
    I just have to remark about how awful that Tubes song is. It was one of the banes of my existence when I had to rely on a 60s-80s radio station to get me through the work day.
  21. dawho5
    If there was a place to start a good one-click resource like that, it's here.
  22. dawho5
    In the interest of discussion, I have a few questions. In matches with juniors/cruiserweights it becomes essential for somebody to be a base, even if that responsibility switches off at times. And there are big men who are great bases for smaller guys to fly around as well as big men who just don't get how. Where do the numbers account for this? And something that factors into every match I've ever seen is adaptability. How do the wrestlers react to botches or unexpected crowd reactions? Can they get the crowd into the match when their usual tricks don't work? These are very important questions and don't seem to be covered in the numbers.
  23. dawho5
    Okay, time out. Did nobody else notice the bit about the intent of the thread partially being to start arguments about the numbers given? Because to me that was one of those "red flags" that might serve as a warning.
  24. This post cannot be displayed because it is in a password protected forum. Enter Password
  25. dawho5
    Because you think he's a better wrestler based on the footage you have seen? I've read some of your stuff on Brisco and you seem to present reasons enough without trying to boil everything down to numbers in categories. One of the reasons I struggle with wrestling video games like EWR/TEW is that they lose all feeling and end up becoming incredibly empty because it boils everything down to numbers or letter grades. So many factors go into every wrestling match that it's impossible to come up with enough numbers to cover all of it.
×
×
  • Create New...