Jump to content
Pro Wrestling Only

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 605
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

I wouldn't consider it a surprise but Dolph saying he's taking a break from WWE would normally be a huge sign that he's going to be in the Rumble.

I kinda hope the Cena thing is a work, because otherwise two blatant false advertisements is something they should get shit for.

Also maybe Roman is feeling well enough to make an appearance?

Posted

I could see Kairi Sane, Undisputed Era, Kacy (American Ninja, can't remember last name), Toni Storm, Pete Dunne, and David Arquette. Well, predictions that have no basis in reality atleast.

Posted

Most stacked wrestling show in a while. The card looks absolutely great:

Rumble matches are always fun. Bryan & AJ will produce magic like they always do. I am not a Balor fan, but I love Brock & he always works well with smaller dudes, so the match will at the very least be very fun. Both of the women's matches look really good on paper too. Hoping for a great night of wrestling!

Posted

Could be an all-time great stadium show. The matches all look strong on paper (except the tag match) but as usual, it's a question of whether clumsy booking undermines the performances.

Posted

Serious question: how is WWE not in blatant violation of truth in advertising laws? Yeah, I know, "card subject to change," but that's supposed to cover things like injuries and acts of God. Advertising a card you have no intention of delivering seems like it should be an open-and-shut case of consumer fraud.

Posted
2 minutes ago, NintendoLogic said:

Serious question: how is WWE not in blatant violation of truth in advertising laws? Yeah, I know, "card subject to change," but that's supposed to cover things like injuries and acts of God. Advertising a card you have no intention of delivering seems like it should be an open-and-shut case of consumer fraud.

Honest answer: since it's wrestling, no one who enforces the rules cares enough to do anything about it.

Posted

They've been calling it the 'annual 30 second royal rumble match' on Raw and Smackdown. Will that really mean all 30 have entered the rumble in less than 15 minutes? 

 

Sounds horrendous if that's really the case.

 

Posted

The men's Rumble being on last is interesting. I've seen people talking about rumours of a major surprise too so I wonder if they've somehow got Rock or Batista or someone to be in that match. Or maybe even Reigns.

Posted
1 minute ago, BigBadMick said:

They've been calling it the 'annual 30 second royal rumble match' on Raw and Smackdown. Will that really mean all 30 have entered the rumble in less than 15 minutes? 

 

Sounds horrendous if that's really the case.

 

32nd annual

Posted
2 minutes ago, FMKK said:

The men's Rumble being on last is interesting. I've seen people talking about rumours of a major surprise too so I wonder if they've somehow got Rock or Batista or someone to be in that match. Or maybe even Reigns.

Yeah I saw the stuff about the surprise as well.  I was thinking Roman

Posted
4 minutes ago, FMKK said:

The men's Rumble being on last is interesting. I've seen people talking about rumours of a major surprise too so I wonder if they've somehow got Rock or Batista or someone to be in that match. Or maybe even Reigns.

Reigns at 30 would result in the pop to end all pops

Posted

To elaborate, John Pollock in his update today seemed to be implying that there is a surprise planned for the men's rumble and that the company thinks it's going to get over well.

Seth just seemed too obvious 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...