I thought the Japan result was strange at the time considering the respective standings of each guy. I wonder if it was a way to punish Almas for some transgression or something.
I love Lorcan. Probably not destined for greatness or anything, but fun to watch and get behind as a scrappy underdog
I think I've only seen that Savage vs Hart match when it aired live on ppv and never again. I remember being let down because they were two of my all time faves and I expected a classic. I'll have to finally rewatch it one of these days
Considering how bad the situation for women as far as being taken seriously was even two years ago, a Mania main event anytime soon is a pretty unrealistic expectation
I agree that Hell in a Cell was sloppy at times, but man come on, you're acting like several highly praised, and awesome, matches from the last couple years were as bad as the piss break divas matches from the previous era
I like the concept. Could be an interesting journey if the young, modern fans, begin to slowly come around on the classic stuff after starting here as novices with a lot of negative preconceptions about the old days. I would suggest uploading the footage if possible and have your commentary over it so everyone can watch along.
On paper this show looks good. Reigns vs Strowman should be heated and hard hitting. I expect Joe vs Zayn to deliver. Charlotte vs Bayley should as well. I'm intrigued with how you book Owens vs Goldberg. Seems wrong to have Goldberg work a competitive long match before facing Lesnar again. Do we get a squash of Owens then?
What percentage of the time do you think WWE storylines payoff in satisfying fashion? I am afraid to provide my answer to that for fear it will be seen as a troll, but I am genuinely curious. I will provide it at some point after other people provide theirs.
I have no idea, depends on your definition of "satisfying". I just feel that there is way too much hand wringing about hypothetical shittyness