LowBlowPodcast Posted April 26, 2017 Report Share Posted April 26, 2017 I'm surprised it's taken this long for this too happen if I honest in terms of expansion. Could you expand on this? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gordi Posted April 26, 2017 Report Share Posted April 26, 2017 After making some searches online, I came upon the realization that there could be some confusion with my championship belts with Lutte Internationale. I found out that the NWA International Tag Team Championship was a regional championship sanctioned by the NWA defended mostly with All-Japan (and previously with the JWA. So to avoid any confusion going further, my championships will be referred as such: NWA Canadian International Heavyweight Championship (currently held by Terry Funk) NWA Canadian International Tag Team Championship (currently held by Rick Martel & Gino Brito) NWA Canadian International TV Championship (currently held by Gino Brito) That way, if gordi wants to make this title active with his JWA, this will prevent any confusion with my championships in Lutte. I appreciate the consideration. It was held by Tenryu and Tsuruta in '85... so maybe there might be a story to tell there some time down the road... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boon Posted April 26, 2017 Report Share Posted April 26, 2017 I'm surprised it's taken this long for this too happen if I honest in terms of expansion. Could you expand on this? It's the natural course of action and it mirrors what happened in real life. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LowBlowPodcast Posted April 26, 2017 Report Share Posted April 26, 2017 Like I said, just too many toes to step on over things. No reason we can't share cities w different arenas. I will keep with exactly what I have. If we make it to 86 we should revisit expansion ideas and see what we can do. In reality, I could just post shows and not the towns if it is really hindering someones experience. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SirEdger Posted April 26, 2017 Report Share Posted April 26, 2017 Honestly, if LowBlow and I were able to make our situation work out, there's absolutely no reason whatsoever why no one else in the game can't share towns too. Let's remember that first and foremost, it's a GAME. We're doing this for FUN. No need to get pissy about it & having our feathers ruffled over that. LowBlow isn't Vince McMahon for real. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boon Posted April 26, 2017 Report Share Posted April 26, 2017 Although this will be seen as disruptive, I don't think anyone was overly offended but also shouldn't just be brushed over as being stupid and needy... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SirEdger Posted April 26, 2017 Report Share Posted April 26, 2017 No, I'm not implying that anyone was stupid and needy. I said from the start that I understood both points of view were valid. But there hasn't been anything so far since I joined the game that couldn't be worked out. Sharing arenas shouldn't be an issue, IMO. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boon Posted April 26, 2017 Report Share Posted April 26, 2017 Should of stated that wasn't an attack on anyone, but as much it's being seen not as s big deal and we can work around it, it also shouldn't be put in the column of meaning nothing to the people who made the comment. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gordi Posted April 29, 2017 Report Share Posted April 29, 2017 I am having problems with my home internet and will only be able to pop in using cafe or convenience store internet until that gets sorted out. We have just started the Golden Week holidays here, so it's pretty bad timing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SirEdger Posted April 29, 2017 Report Share Posted April 29, 2017 No problem. Can happen to anyone! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kevinmcfl Posted April 30, 2017 Report Share Posted April 30, 2017 Would anyone be interested in doing monthly rankings like Pro Wrestling Magazine did. We could do a Top 10 Wrestlers, Top 10 Tag Teams, 10 Most Hated and Top 10 Most Popular. We could each nominate 3 people for each category and then submit our monthly picks with 10 points for a first place vote and 1 point for a 10th place vote. We could even open this up to outside readers and maybe get them more interested and see if they would join. Our votes should be based on how the wrestlers are doing in our game and not in real life. I would love to run this thread if you guys are interested. I do recommend that we can't vote for our own promotion. You could PM me your nominations on the first of the month. I would make the ballot and then you guys could pm your votes. Just an idea! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SirEdger Posted April 30, 2017 Report Share Posted April 30, 2017 Honestly, I'm absolutely down with this. That could be a fun addition to the Project. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GeneJackson95 Posted April 30, 2017 Report Share Posted April 30, 2017 I'm in as well! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kevinmcfl Posted April 30, 2017 Report Share Posted April 30, 2017 Sounds great. When you send me your nominations, you might went to include a one line blurb for the ballot like World Champion Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LowBlowPodcast Posted May 2, 2017 Report Share Posted May 2, 2017 Small proposal out there... With June 1st coming up... I would open the option for a 49th spot for your roster for a jobber pack, manager, or worker... then on January 1st we set the cap at 50. If we make it to 1987... then we can move the cap up. 50 is MORE than enough to move around with. What do you guys think? June 1st cap to 49 January 1st cap to 50 and it stays at 50 for all of 1986? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GeneJackson95 Posted May 2, 2017 Report Share Posted May 2, 2017 Sounds good Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kevinmcfl Posted May 2, 2017 Report Share Posted May 2, 2017 50 is more then enough. Sounds good. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kevinmcfl Posted May 2, 2017 Report Share Posted May 2, 2017 Remember, any one interested in doing the rankings, sen mire your nominations Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gordi Posted May 2, 2017 Report Share Posted May 2, 2017 Do we nominate our own guys, or guys from other promotions. I agree we shouldn't vote for our own guys but I am not clear on nominations. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boon Posted May 2, 2017 Report Share Posted May 2, 2017 Don't really think it makes a difference if it's 49, 50 or 75, there isn't much talent on the free agency that's going to change a promotion drastically at this point. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rainmakerrtv Posted May 2, 2017 Author Report Share Posted May 2, 2017 All sounds good to me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LowBlowPodcast Posted May 2, 2017 Report Share Posted May 2, 2017 The point is not to change a promotion, rather allow opportunity for growth within or around the specific individuals a promotion has, regardless of free agency. The cap is not what you have to have in terms of a number but rather the most that you can have. You have the freedom to utilize those 50 spots or even 20... depending on how you want. That is your choice. We will have the rookie draft in December for next year's fresh faces which will allow some growth. Again, not a huge opportunity but maybe 2-3 spots for some fresh young talent will work and then "older' talent may be freed up to come in as well. Again this is an organic game with change. People come and people go, we know this. There will be roster movement over the next 2-3 months. People will be freed up to move around. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SirEdger Posted May 2, 2017 Report Share Posted May 2, 2017 No problem with that, LowBlow. Kevin, I'm gonna send you my nominations for Top 10 later this week by PM. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boon Posted May 2, 2017 Report Share Posted May 2, 2017 The point is not to change a promotion, rather allow opportunity for growth within or around the specific individuals a promotion has, regardless of free agency. The cap is not what you have to have in terms of a number but rather the most that you can have. You have the freedom to utilize those 50 spots or even 20... depending on how you want. That is your choice. We will have the rookie draft in December for next year's fresh faces which will allow some growth. Again, not a huge opportunity but maybe 2-3 spots for some fresh young talent will work and then "older' talent may be freed up to come in as well. Again this is an organic game with change. People come and people go, we know this. There will be roster movement over the next 2-3 months. People will be freed up to move around. Wasn't the point I was getting at... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SirEdger Posted May 2, 2017 Report Share Posted May 2, 2017 I get what you're saying, Boon. Free agency is mostly just to beef up a roster with lower midcard and enhancement talent at this point. The heavy lifting is made with the trades and such. Besides, some of us prefer to keep a smaller roster, others want to take full advantage of it and that's absolutely cool. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts