Jump to content
Pro Wrestling Only

Reactions to the Honorable Mention List, Part 3


Grimmas

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.4k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

There are many workers who've already dropped that I'd put over Larry, but the new appreciation for stuff like the Enforcers tag and the Regal match likely put him over the top. I enjoy his Dangerous Alliance run for sure, but I also wonder if his trifecta of being a WWF/AWA/WCW guy didn't help him a lot with U.S.-minded voters. Re: his shtick - it feels like poor man's Bockwinkel to me. The idea of watching a mediocre Larry Z match sounds brutal, but when you're really good in 3 or 4 of the better US matches of the 90s, a lot can be forgiven. Someone I probably need to watch more to be better informed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

All I want for you to do is to admit that in order for your argument to hold, you also have to hold that someone could believe that El Gigante > Bryan and at the same time you have maintain with a straight face that they are not wrong, or nuts, or anything else.

 

People can decide for themselves if they want to sign up to a statement like that. If they are prepared to, fine. I am not.

I will, in fact, hold that it is theoretically possible to argue for El Gigante being a better wrestler than Daniel Bryan. It may be a wildly insane, improbable, far-fetched, incredibly particular, left-field argument. And maybe the least popular argument in the history of wrestling fandom.

 

But it wouldn't be factually incorrect.

 

That is all I'm saying. But for the love of God can we stop talking about it.

Oh shit, I'm sorry for stirring the pot, but then someone could theoretically claim that I am a better guitar player than Eric Clapton. No one probably would, but theoretically. That would be absolutely objectively wrong. Someone might (not likely, but still), like my fumblings better, but I'd hope they'd then still say that's subjective and that objectively Clapton's better. Ditto with Gigangte vs Bryan. I think Gigante would have said as much. Sure it gets harder with others. Hence the wonderrful and open debate :-)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Steve Grey was my #33 and the 36th worker on my list to fall. I actually think the workers who rank in one's 30s are maybe the toughest of all to rank, in that on a different day I could have Grey as low as 45 or so. I have Breaks higher than him and hope at least one WoS guy cracks the top 100: it would be a bad under-representation if none of the British rounds style makes the cut.

 

Grey was compared in his post to Tito Santana, but to me he could even be called the Danielson of that time and place, in terms of his character and methods.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Too high a ranking for Low Ki. Such a self-serious ponce, and it hurts his work in the ring. I haven't yet seen the Mysterio match, but in terms of character I'll say that even when he was with the Rottweilers, he always came off to me as the type of kid in school who studied karate, had a pet snake, and would run away crying if anyone scuffed his sneakers in a fight. But I have no love for early ROH prior to Joe's reign of terror, so I get that he's acclaimed as a master of that style and era.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...