I should preface my comments by saying that the largest number of Danielson matches I've seen to date have been from the first half of the 00s. I'm currently watching bits and pieces of his heel run in 2006. I like Danielson. I mean, you'd be hard pressed not to. However, I don't get why he was elevated above his peers from the same era. I don't think Danielson was any better than AJ Styles, Samoa Joe, Low Ki, or Christopher Daniels, to name some of his fellow indy workers. I get that he was a hero to people the same way that Bret was a hero to me, but when people elevate a guy that high and you don't feel a connection with him then you start to pick holes. The same is true of any wrestler, I suppose, but Danielson struck a particular chord with fans who cared a lot about the wrestling that came after I stopped watching. When I watch Danielson, I see a guy who is highly influenced by the tape trading culture and who pieced together a bunch of cool shit from tapes, but had a hard time selling himself as legit. The other guys I named all feel like true versions of themselves. Danielson feels like a community theater actor at times. Perhaps I don't appreciate the irony of his heel act, but everything he does, someone else did better. It's kind of unfair in a way since the people he borrowed from were working on bigger stages in larger arenas, but it doesn't play that well when you're trying to be Nick Bockwinkel in front of a smart crowd. I wouldn't call myself anti-Danielson. I just wish people would chill out with the hyperbole.
I'm also aware that the workers I mention all faded to one extent or another while Danielson had stronger runs in the big leagues. I'm not sure I care all that much about that, though. Some of the TNA stuff that Styles, Joe and Daniels have been doing is clearly better or on par with WWE/AEW Danielson. So yeah, great worker, in the mix, not head and shoulders above anyone.