Jump to content
Pro Wrestling Only

Current WWE


Smack2k

Recommended Posts

Reigns splitting off from the Shield is the thing on the horizon that I am most excited by, but I do hope they do it slowly. The group has been SO awesome that I hope they are able to end perfectly. If that means holding off until the post-Mania lull, or building to a Mania match between Ambrose/Reigns, I'm not sure. My main hope is that they don't lose that match in the shuffle if they do end up making it for Mania.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 9.7k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Wyatts Vs. Punk/Bryan makes sense. It makes sense because The Wyatts beat-up Punk/Bryan on RAW a couple weeks ago.

This sentence epitomizes the dearth of creativity in WWE booking. How many feuds start these days because someone beats someone else up for no reason? There are no real storylines anymore, just vague feuds where the participants trade beatdown segments every week before a match at the big show, and then rinse and repeat until they have fought on about three consecutive PPVs. There are way too many rematches these days and way too many heatless, uninteresting feuds without a solid reason behind them.

 

Compare and contrast to a show like Armageddon 2000, where you have The Radicalz feuding with Team Xtreme after Malenko gets a crush on Lita, leading to some fun, unsettling segments leading up to the show and nice payoffs. Val Venis vs Chyna leads to the whole Chyna neck broken storyline, getting Ivory over as a sick, twisted heel and a ton of heat for the RTC while setting up programs well down the line. Chris Jericho and Kane feuded over Kane getting accidentally burned with coffee, with further build up concentrating on the ugly, deformed Kane being jealous of Jericho's looks and personalities. The main event was a good example of a multifaceted build up, with all participants having various feuds and motivations going in, with the sidestory about Vince worried about losing $1 billion dollars worth of talent and Foley desperate to have a clean WWF title finish.

 

Nobody is going to care about lower and mid card workers if you don't give them a reason to care. Feuds about coffee may seem silly but they are at least about something. WWE is meant to be a soap. But Coronation Street would be pretty rubbish if it was just affairs, murders etc happening every day without any reason or motivation. WWE would do far better if they focused on building characters, that is what most people tune in for.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I mean, I think more people care & would pay for Cena Vs. Del Rio than slapping The Usos & Rhodes Brothers in a big ass tag match.

I don't agree with this at all, and it's a false equivalency. The question is would more people pay for Bryan/Punk v. Harper/Rowan, or for the 6 on 6 Survivor match?

 

The crowd went NUTS when they had that big 6 on 6 brawl segment. They love Bryan. They love Punk. The Rhodes boys and Usos are super over right now. They popped big for that Shield v. Wyatts tease. Doing a 6 on 6 match with all those guys would be way more of a drawing card than a straight tag with Bryan/Punk against the least over of those 12 guys. If you're going to tease that match and then not book it? It doesn't make any sense. Meltzer seems to think that they're booking week to week right now and are just dropping and starting stuff without concrete ideas......and from watching the shows I tend to agree. The whole payoff to the Big Show angle was supposed to be Vince.....they booked and advertised him being on tv the night after HIAC.....then they changed their minds. After they'd done the whole damn angle for two months. And then the payoff they came up with instead was super weak.

 

They haven't even booked a single Survivor match yet. Or anything really. Two title matches and a tag match a week out. I think people who read my posts here know I'm a big fan of WWE's presentation, but how can I not shit on them when they book like this?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wyatts Vs. Punk/Bryan makes sense. It makes sense because The Wyatts beat-up Punk/Bryan on RAW a couple weeks ago.

This sentence epitomizes the dearth of creativity in WWE booking. How many feuds start these days because someone beats someone else up for no reason? There are no real storylines anymore, just vague feuds where the participants trade beatdown segments every week before a match at the big show, and then rinse and repeat until they have fought on about three consecutive PPVs. There are way too many rematches these days and way too many heatless, uninteresting feuds without a solid reason behind them.

 

The night they started the program it was done very well. Bryan tries to cripple HBK.....Hunter doesn't come out to save him. Commercial. Backstage Bryan is brutally attacked by The Wyatts. Bray says, "the devil made me do it". Brie Bella is forced to wrestle immediately afterwards, visibly upset. Later in the show, The Wyatts target Punk....the one guy who hasn't been focused against "The Authority" because he's been so busy with Paul Heyman. Bryan and Punk are now allies with common enemies. Oh and to top that off, Bryan's former running buddy Kane, the guy who the Wyatts abducted and took off of tv.....kneels before Stephanie McMahon?

 

This was all great stuff with so much potential if they connect the dots right.....problem is they haven't really been doing that since that night. I think whoever booked all that on RAW had great ideas.....but the next week they could all be tossed out the window because of way their creative is so chaotic and schizo. I can imagine what would be a great way to book all of that stuff into a cohesive and coherent story....but I doubt we'll see it

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well that's by far WWE's biggest problem. People complain about creative, but clearly they have people who come up with good ideas. The issue is that they get changed around 100x a day before each show. It seems like Vince doesn't have anyone to tell him when something doesn't need changed around, and he's constantly second guessing things.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The question is do they really care that much about the quality of the product? They're making money doing the same stuff people have been complaining about for years. There are so many absurd missteps and periods of total mediocre shows that you could almost pick a random wrestling fan and they could book a more compelling product by themselves as long as they don't indulge in insanity like booking Cesaro vs. Regal as the WM main event or something. If enough people are tuning in (as long as Cena is around) then hey they're making their money. The question of course is what do they do if/when there's no more Cena.

 

I hear a lot about how the problems are too unfocused, too many snap decisions/changes, Vince retuning everything minutes before the show, etc etc. but I don't see how that stuff even produces the overall stagnant product we have. I just don't see any EFFORT outside of a few key stories sometimes. It's not even that it's bad. It's just that nothing happens for a long time, then something happens and maybe it's neat for awhile, then after a few weeks it's not happening anymore and nothing happens again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think when Punk said "Vince McMahon is a millionaire who should be a billionaire" is always right on the money. They seem to recognise a money making opportunity for about 8 weeks and then panic mode sets in when the ratings aren't amazing. Hell, maybe the infatuation with ratings in a DVR society is the telling reminder that WWE are still woefully behind the rest of television.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm pretty sure them being down on Bryan comes more from bad buyrates than weak ratings. But I'll be surprised if Survivor Series doesn't do worse than the last 3 Bryan main evented PPVs. I think Orton vs Show is going to bomb because the undercard is definitely not strong enough to prop it up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No clue what the card is since I don't watch TV but I'm hoping for a big Survivor Series elimination match since I'll be going to the show. And not one of those Diva matches. Something in the 30 minute range would be great.

the card is insanely weak right now

 

Orton v Big Show, which ok, they've done a good job pushing Show and he's over as a babyface now, but nobody really wants to pay to see this

 

Cena v Del Rio? meh. Cena beat him clean with an injured arm, they totally threw Del Rio under the bus here. Nobody is gonna pay to see this, and nobody thinks Del Rio has a chance

 

Bryan/Punk v The Wyatts? I don't know what the f they are doing here. They did that big angle with Punk/Bryan/Usos/Rhodes family v The Shield and the Wyatts......then they book a tag match? why?

 

Ugh, that is just not very good. Can't believe they have only announced three matches at this point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No clue what the card is since I don't watch TV but I'm hoping for a big Survivor Series elimination match since I'll be going to the show. And not one of those Diva matches. Something in the 30 minute range would be great.

the card is insanely weak right now

 

Orton v Big Show, which ok, they've done a good job pushing Show and he's over as a babyface now, but nobody really wants to pay to see this

 

Cena v Del Rio? meh. Cena beat him clean with an injured arm, they totally threw Del Rio under the bus here. Nobody is gonna pay to see this, and nobody thinks Del Rio has a chance

 

Bryan/Punk v The Wyatts? I don't know what the f they are doing here. They did that big angle with Punk/Bryan/Usos/Rhodes family v The Shield and the Wyatts......then they book a tag match? why?

 

Ugh, that is just not very good. Can't believe they have only announced three matches at this point.

 

 

Now we've got Usos/Rhodes Brothers/??? vs Shield/Cesaro/Swagger in the 5 on 5

Link to comment
Share on other sites

how exactly does wwe expect us to feel about these vickie segments

Part of me was thinking that they were smartening up and turn AJ face, but I'm not holding my breath. Actually, between Vickie's "fainting" and JBL's commentary, the segment felt more like a shot at AJ more than anything.

 

RAW gave us this great, and truthful, flub:

 

HHH: "Who do you think you're talking to?"

Orton: "The face of the WWE!"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...