BigBadMick Posted March 26, 2015 Report Share Posted March 26, 2015 Serious heel heat for this guy. Intriguing. Jealous? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JerryvonKramer Posted March 26, 2015 Report Share Posted March 26, 2015 Huh? Nah I reckon I've always worked babyface on the pods. Forum is a different matter ... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigBadMick Posted March 26, 2015 Report Share Posted March 26, 2015 Yeah, that's true. Just pulling your leg mate. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zoo Enthusiast Posted March 26, 2015 Report Share Posted March 26, 2015 Just finished this one. Loved it. Actually agreed with the heel character when he was talking Reigns. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JerryvonKramer Posted March 27, 2015 Report Share Posted March 27, 2015 When the guy said that Sting is arguably Ric Flair's greatest opponent, I laughed out loud. And also felt embarrassed for him. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JerryvonKramer Posted March 27, 2015 Report Share Posted March 27, 2015 Also everyone was right, I genuinely fucking hate this guy. He might actually be less likable than Alice. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Chief Posted March 27, 2015 Report Share Posted March 27, 2015 I would have paid money to have Dylan on this show. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Johnny Sorrow Posted March 27, 2015 Report Share Posted March 27, 2015 I gotta listen to this cause I'm sure I'll love someone who gets this many people all worked up. Or not. Either way I'm gonna actually listen to something I'm not on.😙 So good on him getting listens. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JerryvonKramer Posted March 27, 2015 Report Share Posted March 27, 2015 For me it's not so much his views (which I didn't agree with) but his general manner. I properly didn't like the guy. Something about him. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jesse Ewiak Posted March 27, 2015 Report Share Posted March 27, 2015 Sitterson's a big part of the whole Reddit/Twitter wing of the IWC. Put it this way, he had Shoemaker on his show. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigBadMick Posted March 27, 2015 Report Share Posted March 27, 2015 I would have paid money to have Dylan on this show. Agreed. Will was civilised and easy going about it all. Dylan would have eviscerated the poor bastard. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigBadMick Posted March 27, 2015 Report Share Posted March 27, 2015 For me it's not so much his views (which I didn't agree with) but his general manner. I properly didn't like the guy. Something about him. 'you do know it's scripted, right?' was my breaking point. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
goodhelmet Posted March 27, 2015 Report Share Posted March 27, 2015 I would have paid money to have Dylan on this show. Agreed. Will was civilised and easy going about it all. Dylan would have eviscerated the poor bastard. The problem is I have been on Scott's show before and it's always been a civilized, laid back conversation. Dylan and Scott had a civilized debate about HHH! I had no reason to think I was going to debate Vince Russo on that show. I knew something was amiss when he started ranting about the Bushwackers / Sheepherders. In my head, I am thinking, "who gives a fuck? It's the fucking Bushwackers. Why is this guy arguing?" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zoo Enthusiast Posted March 27, 2015 Report Share Posted March 27, 2015 I was closest to screaming at the speakers when the position of "The Bushwhackers were just below Hogan" was taken. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Chief Posted March 27, 2015 Report Share Posted March 27, 2015 Will, the thing was you weren't even arguing against the Bushwhackers! He felt the need to prove everything you said was wrong and that's when I tuned out. There was no discussion about anything, just constant assertion. If you're gonna make a claim, back it up don't just act like any opinion you have is fact. If anything, I at least got a chuckle out of somebody who sounds like they've only watched Monday Night War era stuff and the current product trying to give you a wrestling education. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grimmas Posted March 27, 2015 Report Share Posted March 27, 2015 Will, the thing was you weren't even arguing against the Bushwhackers! He felt the need to prove everything you said was wrong and that's when I tuned out. There was no discussion about anything, just constant assertion. If you're gonna make a claim, back it up don't just act like any opinion you have is fact. If anything, I at least got a chuckle out of somebody who sounds like they've only watched Monday Night War era stuff and the current product trying to give you a wrestling education. It was difficult to listen too. The wins don't matter, Triple H is great, Bushwhackers were huge draws in the WWF bullshit was awful. There is a lot of people who are bad at podcasts, because they can't speak or stutter or whatever. This guy was great at talking, but was completely awful at making blanket statements with no proof. I know Will couldn't had just ripped him apart, because he is being nice and such. However, if I made those statements Will would had come unglued (because we are friends). It's a shame Phil Schneider wasn't on the show with him. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jmare007 Posted March 27, 2015 Report Share Posted March 27, 2015 Schneider would've laughed for like an hour straight with the claims Sitterson was making. With all the heat dude is having he has to have a one-on-one with Will or Dylan, right? That show sells itself. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shoe Posted March 27, 2015 Report Share Posted March 27, 2015 Plus Grimmas your Canadian. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigBadMick Posted March 27, 2015 Report Share Posted March 27, 2015 I wonder what's being said about Will on Aubrey's forum..... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JerryvonKramer Posted March 27, 2015 Report Share Posted March 27, 2015 As well as being a dick, he is also just completely clueless. Anyone who thinks wins and losses don't matter shouldn't be allowed to watch wrestling, let alone podcast about it. When Scott said that they'd definitely be having him on again, I buried my face in my hands. I don't want to be critical of Scott because that was a tough show to host and there was a sense that he was trying to keep things nice. But there are some instances where the "hey everyone's got an opinion and they are all valid" stuff just isn't right. Part of the issue too is that the guy clearly had an axe to grind about the IWC but had no idea who he was in there with. I don't want a one on one with him and anyone, because I never want to hear him again. Why would anyone want to subject themselves to listening to a ignorant blow hard? Just brutal. One thing I am genuinely interested to know is if the Bushwackers' earnings in WWF do really outstrip their career earnings as the Sheepherders. On the one hand, they shifted merch and would have had some big pay days. On the other, they worked almost nonstop for over twenty five years before WWF, and you can't just assume that territorial pay offs were bad, because they weren't. They would have had some big pay days in Japan and Crockett, Verne wasn't a bad pay guy. Would they have really made more as the JTTS team they were for most of their WWF run than in twenty five years as a drawing tag team? Not saying they wouldn't but just that we can't assume that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grimmas Posted March 27, 2015 Report Share Posted March 27, 2015 As well as being a dick, he is also just completely clueless. Anyone who thinks wins and losses don't matter shouldn't be allowed to watch wrestling, let alone podcast about it. When Scott said that they'd definitely be having him on again, I buried my face in my hands. I don't want to be critical of Scott because that was a tough show to host and there was a sense that he was trying to keep things nice. But there are some instances where the "hey everyone's got an opinion and they are all valid" stuff just isn't right. Part of the issue too is that the guy clearly had an axe to grind about the IWC but had no idea who he was in there with. I don't want a one on one with him and anyone, because I never want to hear him again. Why would anyone want to subject themselves to listening to a ignorant blow hard? Just brutal. One thing I am genuinely interested to know is if the Bushwackers' earnings in WWF do really outstrip their career earnings as the Sheepherders. On the one hand, they shifted merch and would have had some big pay days. On the other, they worked almost nonstop for over twenty five years before WWF, and you can't just assume that territorial pay offs were bad, because they weren't. They would have had some big pay days in Japan and Crockett, Verne wasn't a bad pay guy. Would they have really made more as the JTTS team they were for most of their WWF run than in twenty five years as a drawing tag team? Not saying they wouldn't but just that we can't assume that. About the Bushwhackers. There is no way a 2 year run as a jobber tag team made them more than 25 years as actual draws. That is insanity. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Chief Posted March 27, 2015 Report Share Posted March 27, 2015 Bushwhackers actually worked WWF from 1989-1996 so their run was a little longer than two years. They weren't really full time guys after 1992, but still had hats, action figures, posters, etc. I think WWF even promoted their restauarnt too. But they didn't get to NY until they were in their mid 40's! They worked all over the world for over two decades prior to that, working WWF was just icing on the cake. To act like none of the stuff before mattered is just idiotic on so many levels. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bigelow34 Posted March 27, 2015 Report Share Posted March 27, 2015 As well as being a dick, he is also just completely clueless. Anyone who thinks wins and losses don't matter shouldn't be allowed to watch wrestling, let alone podcast about it. When Scott said that they'd definitely be having him on again, I buried my face in my hands. To be fair, Scott defaults to saying that about every single guest we or he have on. He told fucking Joe Dombrowski he could come on monthly at one point. I think you could hear my head hit the table when he said that one. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grimmas Posted March 27, 2015 Report Share Posted March 27, 2015 By the way the new ad break is perfect. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dylan Waco Posted March 27, 2015 Report Share Posted March 27, 2015 I'll do a show with this guy, but I doubt it lasts 5 mins Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.