Jump to content
Pro Wrestling Only

Is TNA the worst wrestling promotion in history?


Loss

Recommended Posts

I agree. ECIII is a better promo than Rollins, and he's been carrying himself more like a champion this year than Rollins has. You don't see ECIII constantly losing things and running round with his comedy sidekicks like Dastardly and Muttley trying to catch the pigeon. ECIII also wrestles like a heel, whereas Rollins is often guilty of wrestling more like a face (see the Cena series).

 

Of course, this is comparing one of the best runs on TNA with the worst non-Ziggler run in the WWE, but it is a rare thing TNA have done well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 2.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • 3 weeks later...

Apparently Paragon Pro will be leaving the channel now. The show sucked, but at least it was a small level company getting a shot, and not The Little Company That Shouldn't continuing on...again.

 

Wonder if Dixie took an Outlook Express class before they signed this deal?

Read a joke somewhere else about Robbie E getting repackaged as the "E Male" where he comes out and cuts promos on the wrong person every week. I'd watch.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I have been watching 2000 WCW and it's bad... but still not TNA at its worst bad.

Like what time period are you talking about? Because TNA has had some good-decent periods and I struggle to think of a time period that was as consistently awful as 2000 WCW was.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

I was looking at results from TNA at the beginning of 2015 and remembered Meltzer having some positive things to say around that time. I've skimmed through the January to March shows this week (watching matches of interest, and a few promos), as well as the Wolves v Dirty Heels series as they happened last May/June.

 

Without watching the whole shows, and potentially skipping through some nonsense, I've really enjoyed the stripped down feel to the show. The dark arenas (yes, I know why they have dark arenas) feels like a throwback. Crowd reactions in January were perfectly acceptable, and way better in the UK tapings afterwards. The format is to my liking also. Plenty of good talent (Roode, Young, Aries, Joe, Low Ki, Storm, Hardys, Angle, Lashley, Spud, EC3), plenty of good talkers and I feel that in it's own little world it's a perfectly acceptable wrestling show. Standouts were a couple of Joe v Aries, Aries v Ki, Spud v EC3 and the second Angle v Lashley match.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looking at TNA's second quarter of last year, Aries v Angle (aired on 10th June) really stood out.

Angle also had a three match series with Young. I enjoyed the stretcher and Bully Ray-refereed ones.

The Magnus-Storm streetfight at Slammiversary was enjoyable but went into overkill.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm glad there are still some wrestlers (theoretically) getting paid there, but there's nothing else to even say anymore. This thread is almost 9 years old and the question posed in the title was quite relevant then. The fact it's lasted this long is astonishing. It has no value or relevance as a wrestling company, but again I'll at least be nice and say it's great that it keeps some people in work.

 

Also holy crap this thread is nearly 9 years old.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...