Jump to content
Pro Wrestling Only

Comments that don't warrant a thread - Part 3


Loss

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Del Rio's material is some of the worse stuff I've seen from a main event WWE worker in ages. Makes the Sheamus stuff look better by comparison. I don't agree with everything Meltzer has said about this, but I do think he's absolutely right and spot on when he says that WWE has no clue how to script a guy they hope to get over to a Latino audience.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Taking the train from Boston to New York for WrestleMania so looking for a good wrestling book to read for the trip. Suggestions?

I picked this up super cheap off Amazon recently:

 

http://www.amazon.com/The-Encyclopedia-Pro.../dp/0873496256/

 

Posted Image

 

I was buying a few other wrestling related books and saw this pop up down the bottom and thought "for £3 why not?".

 

I've only had a flick through but it looks like it gives quite a nice run down on wrestling history from the very start through the 70s, 80s and 90s. The best thing though is that it is incredibly well illustrated with pictures. Lots and lots and lots of nice pictures, especially from the territory era and pre-50s.

 

There is an A-Z of wrestlers at the back too with little profiles. These are a bit too brief to be of much worth, but there are some interesting tidbits in there. For example:

 

Maurice Tillet (1920s-1940s): The original French Angel, he was a human oddity. Weighing more than 300 pounds with an enormous head and set of hands, he held one version of the world title. He died in 1951 at age 54.

Stuff like that.

 

I think it would occupy you for a train journey without being too taxing. Something you can dip in and out of, or just look at the pictures.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Incidentally, the two other books I bought were Larry Matysik's 50 Greatest Professional Wrestlers of All Time and the Official WWE Encyclopedia 2nd edn, which I've read surprisingly good reviews of. They haven't arrived yet.

 

The sort of library I'm building up here is more an idea than anything else. I like the idea of a guy coming up -- especially an historical guy -- and then being able to consult 5-10 reference books for a look at that guy. The Greg Oliver books are good for that, but I wanted to bolster them with other stuff. The ONE other book I'm considering getting but haven't committed to yet is Tim Hornbaker's Legends of Pro Wrestling. Seems like it might be a decent edition.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The first three or so editions of the PWI almanacs starting around about 1995 had incredible history of wrestling sections.

This reminded me of them mentioning the Dave Schultz-John Stossel incident and saying that Schultz responded to Stossel's question about wrestling being fake. This in a kayfabe mag where the entire fifteen minute segment on 20/20 was exposing the business.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The first three or so editions of the PWI almanacs starting around about 1995 had incredible history of wrestling sections.

This reminded me of them mentioning the Dave Schultz-John Stossel incident and saying that Schultz responded to Stossel's question about wrestling being fake. This in a kayfabe mag where the entire fifteen minute segment on 20/20 was exposing the business.

 

See, back when it happened though, the Apter mags ran editorials saying that the two guys were just nobodies who had an axe to grind. AND that the shots of punches missing were obviously wrestlers dodging punches. :lol:

 

They also pretty much praised Schultz and rewarded him with a cover story, "Ric Flair vs. David Schultz" Flair: 'I Wrestle the Men Hogan is Afraid Of!'" based on one match in Puerto Rico, I think.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's hilarious that there was a period where real journalists (Yeah, I'm stretching that term with Stossel) were doing stories to try and "expose" that wrestling was fake.

 

Hard hitting and informative.

Think it was more to be spiteful. They were guys with "finer tastes" that resented how popular wrestling was in that period. So they tried to tear it down. Of course, Stossel got his ears boxed out for his trouble.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...