Jump to content
Pro Wrestling Only

WWE Network... It's Here


goodhelmet

Recommended Posts

12 hours ago, sek69 said:

Pre 1985 WONs were an interesting process in Dave finding what style and frequency of publishing worked for him. 

Also apparently he's kind of sensitive about those years since that was one of the reasons Todd Martin fell out with the crew over there. Him and Alvarez were doing a bit where Todd would revisit 80s Observers and (allegedly) Dave put the kibosh on that. 

Yeah I am not sure if he was publishing monthly or fortnightly back then. Can't imagine he was doing weekly issues.

Also, yeah, while he is an obstinate dude and will publicly defend constantly calling JYD Junkfood Dog on Twitter, he is also smart. He knows that while a lot of his snark and jokes in the 80s were funny, he probably thinks a lot of them also don't age well, and they were certainly not becoming of the professional publication the WON would eventually become. He is more chilled about his 90s snark, he often comments on his 90s quotes on Twitter. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 6.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • 1 month later...
18 hours ago, Ricky Jackson said:

Any early reviews of Backlund vs Koloff from 4/83?

Short answer: I liked it. Well-layered feats of strength counters. Koloff playing savvy. Good last third with an exciting nearfall and good finish. If you like Backlund, and you do, you'll like this one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, Matt D said:

Short answer: I liked it. Well-layered feats of strength counters. Koloff playing savvy. Good last third with an exciting nearfall and good finish. If you like Backlund, and you do, you'll like this one.

Cool. Yeah, they had the finish/last minute or so on WWE.com (I think?) at one point years ago and it seemed like the end of a hot match

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, Matt D said:

Short answer: I liked it. Well-layered feats of strength counters. Koloff playing savvy. Good last third with an exciting nearfall and good finish. If you like Backlund, and you do, you'll like this one.

About where I landed too, and Ivan's selling on the finish made Backlund look like a killer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/21/2021 at 5:50 PM, Zoo Enthusiast said:

Is there any sort of resource that lets you cross reference the way the episodes were numbered prior to Peacock with how they are now with just dates?  For instance If I’m trying to find WCCW episodes 25, 26, 28, etc?

not that i know of, the world cast thread has the dates of the shows and episode numbers, so episode 24 should be june 4, 1982.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...
On 1/22/2022 at 8:36 AM, TheDuke said:

I thought with WarGames, NXT was just dropping the tag "Takeover" from their Specials, but I wanted to look up when their next one was, and couldn't find anything. Did NXT cancel having specials completely?

they just announced the next one today, "Stand and Deliver", will be part of Mania week. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

The Broken Skull Sessions with Cody Rhodes hit the Peacock Network today.

AEW gets surprisingly more airtime than I ever would have expected - at least a good 20 minutes or so - but of course don't expect anything controversial, but Cody does provide some interesting insights into the balancing act between being a wrestler and being an EVP. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
  • 1 month later...
1 hour ago, JRH said:

So do you think we'll see any changes with the Network/Peacock, or will they keep it as is? 

I think Triple H has slightly more personal interest in historical (especially non-WWE) content than Vince, but I don't see it being at the top of the priority list.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've said it elsewhere, WWE needs a historian position. They used to have Finkel in that position IIRC, but he's since passed on. There are plenty of veterans who are either in the company or are on good terms who could fit that role like Hayes, Lawler, Slaughter, Wippleman, even Heyman. All of them have tons of experience and probably enough knowledge to help juggle the history of WWF/E. But this is getting off-topic so I'll stop. OTOH, I hope we do end up seeing the Vladimir documentary eventually (the Luger one was likely reformatted into the upcoming A&E biography episode).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
On 7/27/2022 at 7:50 PM, Embrodak said:

I do hope that the new regime has a less obsessive drive to rewrite history to make WWE both inevitable and transcendent. Let some real wrestling historians get at that footage and tell some stories, a Tim Hornbaker or Brian Solomon.

I read that as Tim Horner at first LOL (though to be fair, someone like Horner does have history in most of the major promotions).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...