Grimmas Posted May 13, 2015 Report Share Posted May 13, 2015 Aside from Lucha Libre USA and some bad documentaries, the only wrestling on Hulu is WWE, and I imagine there are contracts in place to keep it that way. Community is on yahoo. Hulu has Lucha Libre USA, so why can't another get on there? I suppose Netflix is possible, as there’s a lot of trashy episodic TV from small-time networks on there. By Netflix standards it’s all barely watched, but it’s there. Getting there seems doable only if their TV company has the ability to close the deal, which means hooking up with a hot network that isn't owned by Comcast, FOX, or Disney. Destination America has been “in talks” with Netflix for six months, and nothing’s happened. Even if DA got programming on there, it wouldn’t necessarily be TNA (and they have a better case to make for being there than GFW would). ROH in its present form would stand no chance of getting on Netflix, and I don't see GFW being miles ahead of them. First, why does wrestling have to be trashy? Second, why do you need to be on TV to get on Netflix first? Is there no possible deal that could be made with Netflix for wrestling? It's a long shot, but worth a shot. By the way I am sure people said there was no way wrestling would ever be on MTV or NBC or TNT, etc... as well. The highest paid YouTubers are European video game reviewers and ASMR ladies who open toy boxes while meowing. If those are your kingpins, then Lucha VaVoom, Kaiju and Chikara stand a better chance than Jarrett does. The top attractions have millions of subscribers, and billions of views. In USD, after YouTube takes their sizable 45% cut, the ten biggest acts on Youtube make between $500K and $8 million/year. I’m not saying a wrestling company of TNA rejects can’t make money. But when your best case, virtually impossible scenario earns a couple million dollars a year (and rest assured, GFW would make far less than that), I can understand why Jarrett thinks a mediocre syndication or cable deal has more upside. Maybe that’s short-sighted, but it seems unrealistic to think that a Youtube-only wrestling show of solid hands and also-rans would triumph. Yeah because a medicore syndication deal making more money with nobody watching would be as valuable as a show that would make you less money but way more viewers. It's not like you couldn't sell advertising yourself, as well. If you could get featured on youtube through some kind of deal, get the system behind you the amount of viewers you could bring in would trump any TV deal they could make. Remember wrestling companies used to pay to get on TV in order to get people to watch them, so they would pay for tickets. That is a model that could work today, especially if the TV shows aren't specific TV tapings but more the old ECW model of running actual shows and making TV out of them. They could still sell vod of the shows, sell tickets so there is potential out there. Also, youtube is what kids watch, it's not so much tv anymore. The viewers are growing and growing each year, while more and more people are trading in their cable boxes. The only current free agents in wrestling capable of moving the needle are CM Punk and maybe Shane McMahon. If you’re trying to be an online sensation, who are you putting on your Times Square billboard? TNA at the peak of their financial recklessness in 2010 spent millions to get Hogan, Flair, Hardy, Bischoff, Nash, Hall, and a dozen others. It achieved less than nothing. What does that have to do with anything. They still wouldn't have stars whether on TV or internet. The real goal should be: built your own sensations from scratch, and keep costs low enough that you can afford to grow for five years and learn from mistakes. Make friends in nerd media. Get enough breathing room to make pivots as needed, and become a viable international brand by giving guys from Japan, the UK and Mexico an American platform. Most of which boils down to timing, luck, and putting microphones in front of the right people. You can only do that on some weird tv channel nobody has ever heard of, or could you do it on the internet too? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dawho5 Posted May 14, 2015 Report Share Posted May 14, 2015 TV, internet, however GFW gets their shows seen is secondary to getting their shows seen. But to me that's not the most important part. They have to present something different than WWE, TNA, NXT, anything readily available anywhere so that it stands out enough to get noticed. Otherwise it's just another wrestling show in a sea of wrestling shows. I think that's why LU has had the success it has. It's got a different flavor to it and stands out from the crowd. Obviously this has to be accomplished in a way that can be continued into future seasons, but I think that's the most important thing they can do. Second would be growing your own stars over time. If they can get even two or three current midcard guys over and keep them there as new stars they will have a leg up on the WWE in that regard. I'm not saying don't look for big names right away, but keep an eye on who your crowds (both live and whatever media outlet(s) come along) and make sure you make the new stars you can while you can. If history is any indication the biggest issues even successful promotions have center around the ace going down unexpectedly and floundering until they return. If people are developed from within in relation to the reactions they get from the fans maybe you have a guy ho can keep numbers from nosediving for six months to a year even if they are down while your ace heals. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phil Schneider Posted May 14, 2015 Report Share Posted May 14, 2015 The only really guys unsigned on the indies I see with real star charisma are Eddie Kingston and Nick Gage, and I can't imagine a show built around them although I would watch every second Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mad Dog Posted May 14, 2015 Author Report Share Posted May 14, 2015 I would watch to see how long it took Kingston to fuck up and get fired. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Parties Posted May 14, 2015 Report Share Posted May 14, 2015 Community is on yahoo. Hulu has Lucha Libre USA, so why can't another get on there? Community is a former NBC show that NBC cancelled, which was then picked up by Yahoo, largely to air episodes that had already been written. The show always had bad ratings, despite critical acclaim. Lucha Libre USA’s been canceled for years and serves no threat to anyone. WWE TV is a valued NBCUniversal entity. Hulu is a Viacom, Disney, and Comcast conglomerate. Hulu has done many original series, but none of them have been at all popular. I’m not saying no one else will ever have a wrestling show on Hulu, but I do think that currently, WWE would be made aware of any such conversation and would be strongly opposed to it. WWE - and more importantly, USA - would be made livid by any attempt to bring Global Force to Hulu. First, why does wrestling have to be trashy? Second, why do you need to be on TV to get on Netflix first? Is there no possible deal that could be made with Netflix for wrestling? It's a long shot, but worth a shot. By the way I am sure people said there was no way wrestling would ever be on MTV or NBC or TNT, etc... as well. Destination America has unsuccessfully been trying to get TNA on Netflix since they signed the deal in December, and other programming on prior to that. Wrestling doesn’t have to be trashy, but that’s its reputation. I believe it was Victator who had the epic line, “Wrestling trying to downplay its sleaziness is like a cow denying its milk.” Wrestling got on MTV, NBC, and Turner during two absolute heights of its popularity. The Monday Night War happened (apocryphally) because Bischoff had one wingnut meeting in which Turner himself offered to give him whatever he wanted to be the highest-rated wrestling on TV, during the worst years WWE ever had. It’s a harder sell in 2015. The capital, competition, and public interest isn’t there. I totally agree that it’s worth a shot - it just seems unlikely, and I don’t think Jeff Jarrett is the guy to pull it off. And to be clear: there is no way Netflix produces wrestling as an original series. That is so far off from their branding and what they want to be. They want legitimacy in the press more than they want viewership, which is the same reason most networks and advertisers abhor wrestling. They’re trying to win Emmys. Global Force has a better chance (still zero percent) of being picked up by HBO than they do as a Netflix original. That said: these situations are all quickly malleable. Rock ’n Wrestling happened because Cyndi Lauper liked Lou Albano. If Nicki Minaj takes a huge liking to Lance Hoyt, brings him with her everywhere she goes, puts him in a huge music video, and then begins herself appearing in hot angles on GFW programming, then they're made in the shade. Yeah because a medicore syndication deal making more money with nobody watching would be as valuable as a show that would make you less money but way more viewers. It's not like you couldn't sell advertising yourself, as well. If you could get featured on youtube through some kind of deal, get the system behind you the amount of viewers you could bring in would trump any TV deal they could make. Not sure what Jarrett’s take is, but judging from GFW’s current web presence, I’m guessing he’s a little behind the times. I absolutely agree that in the current media world, there’s more upside in being a Youtube phenom than a middling cable TV personality. The book signings and other events promoting the top online stars look like Beatlemania in the crowds they gather. I’m just not seeing anyone in GFW who could be that phenom. Maybe PJ Black or Moose as real stretches? 3-5 years ago it might have been Chael, but the bloom is off the rose, and they wouldn’t even be getting him right now if he wasn’t damaged goods. Again, the hype around today’s top online stars tends to be that of a supermodel who likes to dress like Star Wars characters. That’s an easier sell than Sonjay Dutt vs. Jigsaw. Which is why I think a more openly fun, comedic group like Lucha Vavoom would stand a better chance of crossing over right now. Remember wrestling companies used to pay to get on TV in order to get people to watch them, so they would pay for tickets. That is a model that could work today, especially if the TV shows aren't specific TV tapings but more the old ECW model of running actual shows and making TV out of them. They could still sell vod of the shows, sell tickets so there is potential out there. I agree that shooting a bunch of backstage segments and promotional video has become an unnecessary burden in wrestling, fueled by producers who resent that they work in wrestling and want to shoot anything but matches. That said, as the most hardcore of hardcore fans, I think we all sometimes have a tough time understanding how unpopular wrestling is right now. If Jarrett went full ECW and produced an R-rated show with top international talent, scantily clad women and innovative gimmicks, it could work. I don't think YouTube or Netflix would come calling, but it could be popular. Or it could be XPW/MLW and sink into quicksand. Your point is taken that drawing a live gate is an important goal. It's also harder than ever in a crowded landscape of companies using the same talent (and better talent to which Jarrett won't have access). Regarding “paying to be on TV”: the people who nowadays pay to be on cable are wealthy buffoons who think they deserve their own reality shows. Most of which never see the light of day. Those chumps have more to spend on vanity projects than Jarrett will have to spend on his, to say nothing of how much cheaper it is to shoot a moron complaining in their kitchen than it is to produce a season of wrestling. What does that have to do with anything. They still wouldn't have stars whether on TV or internet. NYC is currently plastered with Youtube/Simon & Schuster’s posters of Grace Helbig, Shane Dawson, Michelle Phan, and ASAPScience. TNA was lousy in their approach, but at least they could put Hulk Hogan on a poster. Who could Jarrett get right now that matters one iota to NY/LA media? The only other option is to build stars from scratch, which takes incredible luck, cultural cache, and skillful work. Wrestling Society X and Lucha Libre USA had rosters as good as GFW’s, and they flopped. Lucha Underground has superior star power, and they’re not setting the world ablaze. If Lucha Underground was web-only right now, would they be doing better? Impossible to say, but it seems unlikely. You can only do that on some weird tv channel nobody has ever heard of, or could you do it on the internet too? I agree with your sentiment. Online is the future, or at least some cross-pollination of web and TV. You can do it online if you’re brilliantly innovative, broadly approachable, and well-marketed. I just don’t think Jarrett’s that guy, or that anyone currently in wrestling seems eager to try what you’re proposing. YouTube has recently built enormous production studios that could easily house wrestling and market it to the fullest... but why would they right now? Roddy Piper was talking on Cabana's podcast about how he's gonna do a talk show with them, void of wrestling, and even that sounded vague and delusional. If anyone gets there, I suspect it'll be a more media-savvy group like Lucha Vavoom or even PWG, on the strength of their ties to Hollywood comedians, rather than a fairly conventional “TNA Part Deux” show. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KrisZ Posted May 14, 2015 Report Share Posted May 14, 2015 Ask the major sports leagues how important TV still is..... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
goc Posted May 14, 2015 Report Share Posted May 14, 2015 Ask the major sports leagues how important TV still is..... Well yea but that's because they can get big money from advertisers. Wrestling can't. Vince McMahon thought he was going to get sports money when he went through his latest negotiation with USA and it didn't work out for him. Definitely won't work out for an unknown commodity or even one with a decent history of getting over a million people to watch their show every week like TNA. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PeteF3 Posted May 14, 2015 Report Share Posted May 14, 2015 I think the more accurate statement would be, "Ask TV how important the major sports leagues are." Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Johnny Guitar Posted May 14, 2015 Report Share Posted May 14, 2015 Regardless of which format, TV, internet. GFW choose to broadcast their product on. I'm more interested how they present it. TNA throughout their history has mainly been a mish mash of WWF,WCW & ECW circa 1998 - 2001, which really hasn't worked. ROH's style is very niche and isn't really conductive to a main stream audience. I'd love to see GFW produce a more modern take on JCP/WCW, circa 83 to 93 or Smackdown 2006. But thats probably outdated and the audience for that has long since departed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WingedEagle Posted May 15, 2015 Report Share Posted May 15, 2015 I think the more accurate statement would be, "Ask TV how important the major sports leagues are." Framing it both ways has its merits, but the answer is always the money. If GFW or any promotion could receive funding sufficient to run its operations from going the online route I'm sure they would. That's not to say they've all necessarily been prudent enough to explore it, but its also silly to compare a minor league wrestling promotion with a show like Community, which even if it received horrible television ratings still had an established fan base of X million viewers, which forms a base from which an online site can project certain viewership and dollars from bringing it aboard. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
S.L.L. Posted May 15, 2015 Report Share Posted May 15, 2015 And to be clear: there is no way Netflix produces wrestling as an original series. That is so far off from their branding and what they want to be. Again, the hype around today’s top online stars tends to be that of a supermodel who likes to dress like Star Wars characters. That’s an easier sell than Sonjay Dutt vs. Jigsaw. Which is why I think a more openly fun, comedic group like Lucha Vavoom would stand a better chance of crossing over right now. That said, as the most hardcore of hardcore fans, I think we all sometimes have a tough time understanding how unpopular wrestling is right now. Is this where I reassert my theory from 2008-2009 or so that the best approach to a new wrestling TV product (or internet product, or streaming media product as the case may now be) would be to present it as a sort of UFC 1/Street Fighter/WMAC Masters over-the-top fighting competition that explicitly does not refer to itself as wrestling and distances itself from wrestling canon, but uses professional wrestlers for it's roster, utilizes a lot of wrestling gimmickry and storytelling, and is essentially worked BattlArts-style? Because I still kind of believe that, even though it's obviously every bit as ludicrous as any other idea you might come up with. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
concrete1992 Posted May 15, 2015 Report Share Posted May 15, 2015 And to be clear: there is no way Netflix produces wrestling as an original series. That is so far off from their branding and what they want to be. Again, the hype around today’s top online stars tends to be that of a supermodel who likes to dress like Star Wars characters. That’s an easier sell than Sonjay Dutt vs. Jigsaw. Which is why I think a more openly fun, comedic group like Lucha Vavoom would stand a better chance of crossing over right now. That said, as the most hardcore of hardcore fans, I think we all sometimes have a tough time understanding how unpopular wrestling is right now. Is this where I reassert my theory from 2008-2009 or so that the best approach to a new wrestling TV product (or internet product, or streaming media product as the case may now be) would be to present it as a sort of UFC 1/Street Fighter/WMAC Masters over-the-top fighting competition that explicitly does not refer to itself as wrestling and distances itself from wrestling canon, but uses professional wrestlers for it's roster, utilizes a lot of wrestling gimmickry and storytelling, and is essentially worked BattlArts-style? Because I still kind of believe that, even though it's obviously every bit as ludicrous as any other idea you might come up with. I think you just described something close to Nigel's failed Kickstarter. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RocketCrypt Posted May 15, 2015 Report Share Posted May 15, 2015 And to be clear: there is no way Netflix produces wrestling as an original series. That is so far off from their branding and what they want to be. Again, the hype around today’s top online stars tends to be that of a supermodel who likes to dress like Star Wars characters. That’s an easier sell than Sonjay Dutt vs. Jigsaw. Which is why I think a more openly fun, comedic group like Lucha Vavoom would stand a better chance of crossing over right now. That said, as the most hardcore of hardcore fans, I think we all sometimes have a tough time understanding how unpopular wrestling is right now. Is this where I reassert my theory from 2008-2009 or so that the best approach to a new wrestling TV product (or internet product, or streaming media product as the case may now be) would be to present it as a sort of UFC 1/Street Fighter/WMAC Masters over-the-top fighting competition that explicitly does not refer to itself as wrestling and distances itself from wrestling canon, but uses professional wrestlers for it's roster, utilizes a lot of wrestling gimmickry and storytelling, and is essentially worked BattlArts-style? Because I still kind of believe that, even though it's obviously every bit as ludicrous as any other idea you might come up with. I think you just described something close to Nigel's failed Kickstarter. His whole thing was hilarious. "UFC style matches with Breaking Bad storylines". I'm not sure I'd trust anyone to pull off something so ridiculous, never mind Nigel McGuinness. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zoo Enthusiast Posted May 15, 2015 Report Share Posted May 15, 2015 Haha. I had forgotten about that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Memphis Mark Posted May 16, 2015 Report Share Posted May 16, 2015 I think if this tour and taping goes well it wouldn't be half bad taking some untried UK talent such as Rampage Brown, Dave Mastiff, Zack Sabre Jr. & Noam Dar plus bring in some Jarrett has worked with before like Doug Williams and Mark Haskins. Too expensive. GFW would have to pay for work visa's for these guys. Throw the trans on top of that and you would really have a major cost. These guys need to try and get a green card and just move state side. Claudio won a lottery for a green card and it worked out for him. However , all the names you mentioned are great talents. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Memphis Mark Posted May 16, 2015 Report Share Posted May 16, 2015 GFW startiong to release cards for the basebal shows. They are generic house shows . The same matches will be mostly repeated over each weekend. There is a match booedk in Bowling Green , KY between the Young Bucks and PJ Black/ Andrew Everrett . Chuck Taylor is on the first four cards. Chuck and Trent work with Tate Twins in Tennessee . Chuck is in a three way with Jimmy Rave and Jigsaw in jackson , MS. Karl Anderson , Doc Gallows , Chris Masters , Shelton Benjamin are some of the bigger mnames on the tour. Some local talent is getting shots in a few towm . Dustin Starr in Jackson , TN , Luke Hawx in Jackson , MS and Chase Owens/ Jason Kincaid in Knoxville , TN . It looks like a lot of guys are getting a look at these baseball shows , which is great for everybody. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
S.L.L. Posted May 16, 2015 Report Share Posted May 16, 2015 His whole thing was hilarious. "UFC style matches with Breaking Bad storylines". I'm not sure I'd trust anyone to pull off something so ridiculous, never mind Nigel McGuinness. I was thinking more "Onita vs. Aoyagi-style matches with Big Trouble in Little China storylines"...yeah, that'd end about as well. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
clintthecrippler Posted May 16, 2015 Report Share Posted May 16, 2015 Is this where I reassert my theory from 2008-2009 or so that the best approach to a new wrestling TV product (or internet product, or streaming media product as the case may now be) would be to present it as a sort of UFC 1/Street Fighter/WMAC Masters over-the-top fighting competition that explicitly does not refer to itself as wrestling and distances itself from wrestling canon, but uses professional wrestlers for it's roster, utilizes a lot of wrestling gimmickry and storytelling, and is essentially worked BattlArts-style? Because I still kind of believe that, even though it's obviously every bit as ludicrous as any other idea you might come up with. Replace "Battlarts-style" with lucha and you basically have what Lucha Underground is doing right now. And it's frigging awesome. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
concrete1992 Posted May 16, 2015 Report Share Posted May 16, 2015 And the first shows in Global Force Wrestling history are... JUNE 12th(Jackson, TN) Tate Twins (Brent and Brandon) v Best Friends (Chuck Taylor/Trent Baretta) Lei’D Tapa v Thea Trinidad Sonjay Dutt v Jamin Olivencia George T. Murdoch v Moose Chris Masters v Dustin Star Bullet Club v New Heavenly Bodies REFEREES: Chris Sharpe and Will Gibson ***Special Guest: Jim Cornette*** JUNE 13th(Knoxville, TN) Tate Twins (Brent and Brandon) v Best Friends (Chuck Taylor/Trent Baretta) Lei’D Tapa v Thea Trinidad Sonjay Dutt/Chase Owens v Jamin Olivencia/Jason Kincaid George T. Murdoch v Moose Chris Masters v Devin Driscoll Bullet Club v New Heavenly Bodies REFEREES: Chris Sharpe and Will Gibson ***Special Guest: Jim Cornette*** JUNE 20th(Jackson, MS) Sonjay Dutt v Jimmy Rave Chuck Taylor v Jigsaw Luke Hawx v Luke Gallows Hot Shots (Cassidy Riley/Chase Stevens) v Andrew Everett/PJ Black Lei’D Tapa v Thea Trinidad Chris Masters v Shelton Benjamin REFEREES: Chris Sharpe and Will Gibson ***Special Guest: Scott Hall*** JUNE 21st(Bowling Green,KY) Sonjay Dutt v Jigsaw v Jimmy Rave Lei’D Tapa v Thea Trinidad Cliff Compton v Chuck Taylor Moose v Luke Gallows Young Bucks (Matt Jackson/Nick Jackson) v Andrew Everett/PJ Black Chris Masters v Shelton Benjamin REFEREES: Chris Sharpe and Will Gibson ***Special Guest: Scott Hall* Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matt D Posted May 16, 2015 Report Share Posted May 16, 2015 I actually hadn't been too worried about the star power, relative to other people's concerns, but those shows don't have main events. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
concrete1992 Posted May 16, 2015 Report Share Posted May 16, 2015 Are you trying to tell me that Chris Masters vs. Shelton Benjamin won't be selling out baseball parks throughout the country?! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Slasher Posted May 16, 2015 Report Share Posted May 16, 2015 I still think the answer is simple: 1. Present your product in "seasons" format, with a premiere and finale in place and offseasons to rest your talents. 2. Make it strictly a television/internet property, so you would have them wrestling in something similar to television studios with no wrestling audiences. Maybe you have studio audience for extra revenue but I would prefer if not. 3. Going back to the first point, having a season means having a storyline arc with a clear end game leading into the season finales. This means developing characters and creating an internal logic that never betrays itself. 4. Actually have auditions for roles. This means you are likely to have actors playing characters rather than wrestlers attempting to act. Obviously the ideal guy would be Dwayne Johnson who can do both, but you can branch out to guys like Channing Tatum or etc who can credibly play tough characters while possessing a higher skillset in acting. As an addition to this point, ideally you put your chosen actors through something akin to wrestling school/performance center so you aren't asking actors to do unsafe moves on each other with no training. It also means getting rid of the old "lets break them down so we can build them up" mentality. Treat your actors with respect when putting them through training and try to enhance their experience so you can have more people wanting to audition in future seasons rather than be scared off with horror training camp stories. I think that is the real future for non WWE mainstream wrestling...if such a thing could exist. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shoe Posted May 16, 2015 Report Share Posted May 16, 2015 I might skip the Round Rock show if this is what they're selling. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
goc Posted May 16, 2015 Report Share Posted May 16, 2015 I liked the roster on paper but those lineups really aren't very interesting. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zoo Enthusiast Posted May 17, 2015 Report Share Posted May 17, 2015 I don't think they'd sell out my high school baseball diamond with one set of bleachers. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.