WingedEagle Posted July 13, 2016 Report Share Posted July 13, 2016 If Reigns turned heel tomorrow would he immediately get the babyface pop they're seeking? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
goodhelmet Posted July 13, 2016 Report Share Posted July 13, 2016 Good isn't the right word. It was a lot of things far more important than good -- different, memorable, unique and entertaining. This... my god, this!!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
artDDP Posted July 14, 2016 Report Share Posted July 14, 2016 My guess is that Shane will get a heel GM that he can embarrass every few weeks and Stephanie will get a babyface GM that foils her dastardly plans. The obvious choice for Raw would be Daniel Bryan. I have no idea who goes to Smackdownunless they really do put Triple H there. No way is he stooging for Shane (or anyone), though. I'm guessing next week Vince says they get to pick each other's GMs? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grimmas Posted July 14, 2016 Report Share Posted July 14, 2016 My guess is that Shane will get a heel GM that he can embarrass every few weeks and Stephanie will get a babyface GM that foils her dastardly plans. The obvious choice for Raw would be Daniel Bryan. I have no idea who goes to Smackdownunless they really do put Triple H there. No way is he stooging for Shane (or anyone), though. I'm guessing next week Vince says they get to pick each other's GMs? For some reason I thought Shane/Steph were being put in the roles they got, so they wouldn't be on TV weekly. The GM would be doing that, while they would show up less frequently. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
C.S. Posted July 14, 2016 Report Share Posted July 14, 2016 My guess is that Shane will get a heel GM that he can embarrass every few weeks and Stephanie will get a babyface GM that foils her dastardly plans. The obvious choice for Raw would be Daniel Bryan. I have no idea who goes to Smackdownunless they really do put Triple H there. No way is he stooging for Shane (or anyone), though. I'm guessing next week Vince says they get to pick each other's GMs? This only makes sense if Shane picks Bryan, Steph picks a heel (Triple H?), and then both GMs get switched in the Draft. Otherwise, why would they logically pick people who would go against their interests? I don't like your Vince scenario. No one is going to give the other person someone as beloved as Daniel Bryan. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sek69 Posted July 14, 2016 Report Share Posted July 14, 2016 The exchange between Shane and Steph where Triple H was mentioned leads me to believe she will pick Bryan as her GM as a suck up to the crowd, Shane will counter by picking Hunter, then Vince will pull the "swerve" and switch them. There was also something with the app publishing then quickly deleting a story about the Yes Movement being welcomed to Smackdown which makes me think he's the plan there. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Infinit Posted July 15, 2016 Report Share Posted July 15, 2016 Bischoff cancelled an Indy date he had up here in Toronto this weekend. He could be one of the new GMs. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SirEdger Posted July 15, 2016 Report Share Posted July 15, 2016 I wouldn't be surprised if that happens. I remember recently that when someone asked him on Twitter if he would be running one of the two shows, he answered "Stay tuned". Bischoff is usually a straight shooter with this kind of stuff so if he cancelled that indy date, that could very well mean he's on his way to run either RAW or Smackdown. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragemaster Posted July 15, 2016 Report Share Posted July 15, 2016 If Bischoff coming in, they should off on Monday had Vince come out and swerve both Steph and Shane. Vince should have done a speech about competition and when it was at it strongest it was when he was at war with WCW. Then drop the Bombshell that Smackdown is dead and Nitro is back and Bischoff Running it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gutenberger Posted July 15, 2016 Report Share Posted July 15, 2016 Yeah, but then Raw would have to move to Tuesday, because it' Monday Nitro and to my knowledge always has been, whereas we all know and love "Tuesday Raw Tuesday". Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Loss Posted July 15, 2016 Report Share Posted July 15, 2016 At some point, WWE has to break with the 90s. Like, really break with the 90s. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zoo Enthusiast Posted July 15, 2016 Report Share Posted July 15, 2016 I check these threads every few weeks to see if I am missing anything. Always relieved to find out that I'm not. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Woof Posted July 15, 2016 Report Share Posted July 15, 2016 There was also something with the app publishing then quickly deleting a story about the Yes Movement being welcomed to Smackdown which makes me think he's the plan there. Seems more likely they'd be adding him to commentary team, seeing as how Byron Saxton will have to be taken off of either Raw or Smackdown. They probably used the CWC tapings as a trial run, liked his chemistry with Mauro, and will need a more wrestling-oriented color guy to play off Lawler's shenanigans. In a perfect world they'd completely revamp both commentary teams, but well all know that's not gonna happen, Maggle! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
El-P Posted July 15, 2016 Report Share Posted July 15, 2016 At some point, WWE has to break with the 90s. Like, really break with the 90s. You don't say. Won't happen until a new "Golden Age". Which probably never come at this rate. Not anytime soon anyway. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Loss Posted July 15, 2016 Report Share Posted July 15, 2016 There was also something with the app publishing then quickly deleting a story about the Yes Movement being welcomed to Smackdown which makes me think he's the plan there. Seems more likely they'd be adding him to commentary team, seeing as how Byron Saxton will have to be taken off of either Raw or Smackdown. They probably used the CWC tapings as a trial run, liked his chemistry with Mauro, and will need a more wrestling-oriented color guy to play off Lawler's shenanigans. In a perfect world they'd completely revamp both commentary teams, but well all know that's not gonna happen, Maggle! The story about Lawler a few months ago was interesting -- that they've been open to replacing him for a while but they are afraid of what he'd say in the media if they ever let him go. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Strummer Posted July 15, 2016 Report Share Posted July 15, 2016 I wonder if they are bringing Bischoff back because his DVD sold well. I didn't see the numbers but with the way they think that could be the reason they want him on air again Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
S.L.L. Posted July 16, 2016 Report Share Posted July 16, 2016 At some point, WWE has to break with the 90s. Like, really break with the 90s. "Has" is a strong word. They don't have the immediate financial incentive other than "we can do better", which doesn't seem to be enough without the alternative of "we will die if we don't". Even then, the people in charge seem so out of it that I'm not sure that would be enough. Like, they could legit be going out of business, and their response would be "we gotta double down on the 90's!" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Loss Posted July 16, 2016 Report Share Posted July 16, 2016 I meant "has" as an article of faith. Like, it has to happen at some point, right? Silly me, of course it doesn't. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
artDDP Posted July 21, 2016 Report Share Posted July 21, 2016 I was way off on my GM prediction. I thought they'd go for more shenanigans but so far it doesn't appear that way. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sek69 Posted July 21, 2016 Report Share Posted July 21, 2016 So apparently it was reported that the plan for Roman's return is to go right back to pushing him as top babyface. Between that and having someone other than Bayley as Sasha's mystery partner, that could spell quite the fan backlash on the PPV on Sunday. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
C.S. Posted July 21, 2016 Report Share Posted July 21, 2016 I think the rumor about them pushing Roman as a babyface is either bullshit/misdirection or plans have changed. Booker T flat out said on the Network Draft Center special that the fans hate Roman and he questioned the Usos about the fans hating them too because of their association with Roman. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.