Jump to content
Pro Wrestling Only

Dave Meltzer stuff


Loss

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Microstatistics said:

Way too many people treat Meltzer's comments and ratings as gospel and that exacerbates anything controversial Meltzer says. It's sort of understandable considering, like Loss and others had discussed previously, he is considered maybe the only "legitimate" and established wrestling critic. But it's still completely wrong considering how this is all subjective. Comments like that are just gonna fuel revisionism and tribalism ("Oh if you don't see the genius of Kenny Omega, then you aren't a real fan"). Plus it is such a general, throwaway statement that it comes off as arrogant, bordering on troll, because he didn't actually say how the modern standards are elite and workers think outside the box. 

Agreed. It’s impossible to argue with a statement like that since he fails to back it up with any specific examples. It’s just another Twitter Dave hot take designed to incite controversy and little else. If you’re getting triggered into going on a message board and bitching about how he only likes “CrossFit wrestling” then you’re doing exactly what he wants you to do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 9.6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

7 minutes ago, fxnj said:

Agreed. It’s impossible to argue with a statement like that since he fails to back it up with any specific examples. It’s just another Twitter Dave hot take designed to incite controversy and little else. If you’re getting triggered into going on a message board and bitching about how he only likes “CrossFit wrestling” then you’re doing exactly what he wants you to do.

If his goal is to get people to point out how shitty his opinions are, then kudos. He has won this day.

Being a journalist and all, perhaps his priorities should aim a smidge higher though? Just a thought.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Crossfit wrestling" is my new least favourite board gimmick. Get done with it already, people.

As far as the rest goes, I happen to agree totally with Meltz as far as Omega vs Okada feud being the best ever maybe, and this G1 being on another level than pretty much anything ever. And totally disagree about him shitting on Taichi, for instance. So there. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I totally agree with Meltz about the current NJ greatness. Okada & Tanahashi especially (it really struck me during the G1) are the like best Bret Hart ever mixed with a modern high end offensive style. And Bret Hart to me was a much better wrestler than Michaels anyway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, Johnny Sorrow said:

Why are "some people " "disputing " the notions that Dave actually said? 

Not even sure what I'm disputing, but today's style is much about theatrics and how it looks on the surface than ever before. Each person can find that better or worse than before, I don't think that matters tbh, it is what it is. But I see today's New Japan or almost any other promotion (besides few matches from each one) style not having a lot to do with realism and logic, at least not compared to the other stuff.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

https://twitter.com/davemeltzerWON/status/1060684502295502848

"Matches I gave 5 stars in the past when I watch back with today's eyes are usually closer to **** today. The standard has evolved so much higher as the younger wrestlers learn from a greater variety of styles, places and different styled opponents."

A bit late on this but obvious troll is obvious. Argues how 6 and 7 star matches are reasonable while retroactively downgrading 5 star matches from the past and making generalized, outlandish claims not supported by any evidence. It makes sense to use him as a reference for finding matches but there is no reason to take anything he says seriously. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So in what has to be the absolute bottom of the barrel, the Bischoff/Russo stans are now chirping at Dave for saying Ready to Rumble was a bad movie.  I didn't even know that was a matter of debate. 

(Context: David Arquette was asked if there would ever be a sequel made, and he said he was down for it but Scott Caan did not want to do it)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Listening to Meltzer and Alvarez talking about Raw, and yeah, the show really sucked but them getting annoyed at Strowman's promo because he exaggerated the severity of his injury is so dumb. Like, they do know that the point of pro-wrestling is to lie, right?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/27/2018 at 9:18 AM, FMKK said:

Listening to Meltzer and Alvarez talking about Raw, and yeah, the show really sucked but them getting annoyed at Strowman's promo because he exaggerated the severity of his injury is so dumb. Like, they do know that the point of pro-wrestling is to lie, right?

This amuses me. Dave glosses over some of the most incredible logic gaps ("That's just WWE") yet often finds some random bit of minutiae to get irritated with like exaggerating an injury.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, artDDP said:

This amuses me. Dave glosses over some of the most incredible logic gaps ("That's just WWE") yet often finds some random bit of minutiae to get irritated with like exaggerating an injury.

I've never figured out when Dave actually gets annoyed by that kind of stuff or when he's trying to make a joke/be sarcastic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think I have Meltzer's hot takes and general lack of real content in his Twitter figured.  

He's trying to hang on to subscribers any way he can.  Let's face it, what he does is no longer as necessary as it was in the 90s or early 2000s.  You don't need the Observer or the Torch or whatever other newsletter whose writer you agree with on wrestling to tell you about what happened in this promotion across the world.  It's all on a streaming service that at least 5 people who post on the same board as you do have.  Writers like Dave Meltzer are becoming marginalized by the sheer availability of wrestling and he's just hanging on for dear life.

I say this not as a commentary on Meltzer himself.  I think the world has changed and pro wrestling changed with it.  Meltzer just wants to keep doing what he loves and getting paid for it, which is completely understandable.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, dawho5 said:

I think I have Meltzer's hot takes and general lack of real content in his Twitter figured.  

He's trying to hang on to subscribers any way he can.  Let's face it, what he does is no longer as necessary as it was in the 90s or early 2000s.  You don't need the Observer or the Torch or whatever other newsletter whose writer you agree with on wrestling to tell you about what happened in this promotion across the world.  It's all on a streaming service that at least 5 people who post on the same board as you do have.  Writers like Dave Meltzer are becoming marginalized by the sheer availability of wrestling and he's just hanging on for dear life.

I say this not as a commentary on Meltzer himself.  I think the world has changed and pro wrestling changed with it.  Meltzer just wants to keep doing what he loves and getting paid for it, which is completely understandable.  

I think you are underselling what Meltzer does. His value is in far more than regurgitating what people could see on a streaming service for themselves. His value is in telling people about what they can’t see on the screen for themselves but want to know. His value is far, far more in news, history, and analysis then it is in recaps or match recommendations.  If it wasn’t, he would have been irrelevant long ago.

Given that, I think the increased accessibility to wrestling only helps him. His base has always been the hardcore fans. Increased accessibility has only made more fans into hardcore fans. There are far more people interested in learning more about New Japan now than five years ago and that plays into Meltzer’s business. Yes, you can find people on message boards who know a lot about wrestling but how much of their knowledge comes from Meltzer? There is not a single person out there that can match Meltzer for depth and breadth of pro wrestling knowledge. Could someone (or more likely, a group of people) outdo Meltzer on those important facets of his job (news, historical perspective, business analysis) and offer the service in one place at a a better price (or for free)? Sure and that might happen, but it hasn’t yet. In any event, I don’t think the services Meltzer provides are being marginalized and will become irrelevant anytime soon. If anything, the thirst for the reporting he provides will only increase with more and more hardcore fans, which is what more and more viewing options should create.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...