Jump to content
Pro Wrestling Only

Dave Meltzer stuff


Loss

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 9.6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

It's been 40 years since "Let It Be" came out.

I was a highschool freshman in 89, approximately 40 years after Bing Crosby put out his first Christmas albulm.

I wouldn't have called any of my highschool classmates douches because they didn't have more than a passing familiarity with Crosby.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well yeah but Gretzky and Jordan are the default "greatest of all time" answers in their sports. Bo Jackson isn't that guy in either football or baseball, as fine an athlete as he was.

 

He was a mega-star of his time sure, but is he on that level? Not really. It seems reasonable he wouldn't be as known among current younger fans as the other two.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think part of it is due to the different availabilities of different pop culture heroes. You can go into pretty much any music store in the world and easily pick up all of the Beatles' biggest records. Where would you need to go to find all of Bo Jackson's greatest performances? Aside from Youtube, I don't know where I'd even start looking.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To me I think the other point I'm making there is that, in real sports, at the end of the day things like statistics and winning matter. Gretzky and Jordan are guys that have the weight of that on their side. Bo was good, but not *that* good when you're talking about comparing lasting fame in that kind of a context. To most fans of legitimate sports looking back on past eras, that's going to be the deciding factor about what players/teams they are going to focus on looking at. This doesn't necessarily apply to the same degree to forms of "pure entertainment", although obviously if a band sold more albums in their career, it generally makes them easier to access.

 

In the context of wrestling discussion when comparisons come up, I much prefer the concept of comparing wrestling to "objectively entertaining" things like music or film than I do to legitimate athletics for that reason.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Even still, let's say you go into the music/video section of your local Sam Goodys or Best Buy or Barnes & Noble or whatever. You'd easily, easily find a shitload of stuff involving the Beatles and other famous musicians. Would you find more than one or two DVDs devoted to Jordan or Gretzky or Ali or Ruth or any other super-famous sports star? Those just seem like there's not many of them. Hell, it's easier to buy an old Wrestlemania than it is to get your hands on an old Super Bowl.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know if this is some kind of change over the last decade and a half but when I was a HS senior I knew plenty of big Beatles fans. And when I was in 8th grade there were a bunch of Smiths fans.

When I was in high school (1981-84), there was exactly one Beatles t-shirt that ever got worn by one person in that school. Of course the same person also wore Who, U2, Stones, Pretenders, Clash and a variety of other shirts. :) But a fair number of other folks wore those other shirts. The Beatles in that period were "known"... but that was less than 15 years after they'd split, a year after John got shot... and they were way in the background.

 

Time passes rather fast. Bo was monsterous in the late 80s. To a generation he still has meaning. But it's on 20 years now.

 

John

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the show just happened to come out during that 6 month span where Bo was arguably the most popular athlete around. You had the endless Nike ads, all the publicity for the "Bo Breaker", the "running up the wall" Spiderman catch that was replayed to infinity as a highlight, the giant All-Star game homer (off Rick Reuschel.*sigh*). Bo was HUGE right at that moment. Nobody knew at the time he was an average fielder at a weak position, struck out a bunch, with decent speed and big power. At the time he was viewed as a mega star.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I saw Bo play live once. He... did not have a good day. The White Sox got MURDERED twelve to zip. I mean, jesus, this was like watching dozens of Goldberg clones beat up an entire roomful of Mulkeys. All I remember afterwards is that none of the players were in the mood to sign autographs, they all stormed past the children in such pissed-off moods that some of the kids were crying.

 

...I have no idea what the point of that story was, but I'm sure it was pertinent somehow.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The fact that a throwaway joke I made has generated interesting discussion is a hoot. It's why I dig this place. :lol:

 

And the Beatles are timeless. My roommate's 15 year old went through a huge Beatles phase last year, and not from any influence from the adults in the house. That evolved into Led Zeppelin pretty quick, as he's playing guitar. He currently is "digging" Pink and Kanye and Nicki Minaj, because he's 15 and wants to score some pussy. He's actually learned Pink songs on guitar so girls in his class can sing along. :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know if this is some kind of change over the last decade and a half but when I was a HS senior I knew plenty of big Beatles fans. And when I was in 8th grade there were a bunch of Smiths fans.

When I was in high school (1981-84), there was exactly one Beatles t-shirt that ever got worn by one person in that school. Of course the same person also wore Who, U2, Stones, Pretenders, Clash and a variety of other shirts. :) But a fair number of other folks wore those other shirts. The Beatles in that period were "known"... but that was less than 15 years after they'd split, a year after John got shot... and they were way in the background.

 

Time passes rather fast. Bo was monsterous in the late 80s. To a generation he still has meaning. But it's on 20 years now.

 

John

 

I know a wise man who once said....

 

It's a big world out there beyond the bubble you live in. That we all live in. Projecting beyond the bubble runs quickly into that don't fit so well into what we think we "know".

;)

 

The Beatles were not exactly the brief pop culture dalliance that Bo Jackson was.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know if this is some kind of change over the last decade and a half but when I was a HS senior I knew plenty of big Beatles fans. And when I was in 8th grade there were a bunch of Smiths fans.

When I was in high school (1981-84), there was exactly one Beatles t-shirt that ever got worn by one person in that school. Of course the same person also wore Who, U2, Stones, Pretenders, Clash and a variety of other shirts. :) But a fair number of other folks wore those other shirts. The Beatles in that period were "known"... but that was less than 15 years after they'd split, a year after John got shot... and they were way in the background.

 

Time passes rather fast. Bo was monsterous in the late 80s. To a generation he still has meaning. But it's on 20 years now.

 

John

 

We're now in the age of CD's, the Beatles Anthology and digital downloads. It's easier for a kid to become a Beatles fan now than in the early 80's. The Beatles aged a lot better than Bo Jackson did ;)

 

Plus today's music sucks! [/crankyoldman]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Beatles were not exactly the brief pop culture dalliance that Bo Jackson was.

As the Beatles Fan referenced above, I know. :)

 

And I was pleased to see 1 end up being the best selling album of the decade 30 years after the Beatles split. :)

 

Still, there are lots of people who don't know who the Beatles are.

 

John

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest kidd

I work at FYE ( a major north american music chain) we sell a ton of beatles stuff year round, it does really well during holidays but we sell ti all the time. We have mugs with the album covers, throw blankets, 3d wall posters and other stuff besides the cds and movies, and it sells to all ages. Then again on the other side of the coin when we hire new associates I always ask them if they can name the members of the Beatles and a good portion of them can't, hell some don't even get one and that makes me really sad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...