Dwide Schrude Posted January 26, 2015 Report Share Posted January 26, 2015 Anyone know about refunds for tonight's Raw? Not because of the Rumble but because CT is supposed to have a blizzard tonight. For arguments sake, if Daniel Bryan won last night I would come to Raw in a blizzard, though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dwide Schrude Posted January 26, 2015 Report Share Posted January 26, 2015 Sitting here thinking about how they can salvage this mess.... Double turn Reigns and Lesnar (even though Brock is already getting cheered and Reigns is already getting booed) in the build to Mania with Heyman managing Reigns, and both of them sort of joining the authority, leaving Seth Rollins a forgotten man. Reigns conquers Lesnar at Wrestlemania much to the chagrin of everyone in attendance, then Seth Rollins cashes in and takes the title catapulting himself into being one of the biggest babyfaces in the company. Cena loses to Rusev at Fast Lane, Daniel Bryan vs Rusev at Wrestlemania. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
anarchistxx Posted January 26, 2015 Report Share Posted January 26, 2015 Sitting here thinking about how they can salvage this mess.... Double turn Reigns and Lesnar (even though Brock is already getting cheered and Reigns is already getting booed) in the build to Mania with Heyman managing Reigns, and both of them sort of joining the authority, leaving Seth Rollins a forgotten man. Reigns conquers Lesnar at Wrestlemania much to the chagrin of everyone in attendance, then Seth Rollins cashes in and takes the title catapulting himself into being one of the biggest babyfaces in the company. Cena loses to Rusev at Fast Lane, Daniel Bryan vs Rusev at Wrestlemania. A far more likely scenario being: Bryan loses to Rusev at Fast Lane, John Cena vs Rusev at Wrestlemania... He never went for the STF in the match IIRC which I thought was odd. Pretty sure he countered with curb stomp into the STF at one point on Rollins. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JerryvonKramer Posted January 26, 2015 Report Share Posted January 26, 2015 John Cena desperately needs to come up with a new finish and retire the AA for a while. At this point it's about as effective as a bodyslam in big main events. He never went for the STF in the match IIRC which I thought was odd. The only sub attempt I remember was Brock's Kimura which Cena stood up out of leading to a flying knee to Brock's skull from Seth I wrote in a Facebook chat that Cena only ever seems to do one move. The AA was like his sole offense in that match. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
anarchistxx Posted January 26, 2015 Report Share Posted January 26, 2015 That criticism of John Cena is straight out of 2005, Jerry. How long have you been out the WWE loop? Criticizing a WWE worker for lack of moves is an old and outdated trope. It is true they are often limited in that respect but that is down to the style. Cena has a serviceable amount of offense for a main eventer, especially since he spends a lot of time selling. It is a strange criticism of him last night when he randomly used a Powerbomb and Michinoku Driver. His range of offense is far greater than that of his predecessors Hogan & Austin. He regularly uses a flying leg drop, diving shoulder block, sit out back drop, STF, release fisherman, cross body. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sek69 Posted January 26, 2015 Report Share Posted January 26, 2015 The main issue people have with Cena these days are his horrible punches and his weird style of moving/bumping that is only getting more pronounced as the injuries pile up. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JerryvonKramer Posted January 26, 2015 Report Share Posted January 26, 2015 That criticism of John Cena is straight out of 2005, Jerry. How long have you been out the WWE loop? Criticizing a WWE worker for lack of moves is an old and outdated trope. It is true they are often limited in that respect but that is down to the style. Cena has a serviceable amount of offense for a main eventer, especially since he spends a lot of time selling. It is a strange criticism of him last night when he randomly used a Powerbomb and Michinoku Driver. His range of offense is far greater than that of his predecessors Hogan & Austin. He regularly uses a flying leg drop, diving shoulder block, sit out back drop, STF, release fisherman, cross body. I don't know I've seen a fair bit of Cena and he only ever seems to hit finishers to me. It's like his entire offensive arsenal is built around the idea of the false finish. Product of the time I guess, but as I've watched more 70s wrestling, I've become less and less enamoured at the very concept of a finisher and here's a guy who seems to be only finisher. I did enjoy the match, but I had it at **** and others seem to be talking about it in MOTY terms, so I'm guessing I'm lower than most. Part of me also wonders if that was Scott Steiner circa 1992 or Kurt Angle circa 2002 throwing 20 German suplexes people might not be going so ga ga over it. But Brock seems to get a pass. But you know me, I love suplexes! I didn't think Rollins was very good in the match, and the stretch with Cena brought it down a fair bit. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grimmas Posted January 26, 2015 Report Share Posted January 26, 2015 That criticism of John Cena is straight out of 2005, Jerry. How long have you been out the WWE loop? Criticizing a WWE worker for lack of moves is an old and outdated trope. It is true they are often limited in that respect but that is down to the style. Cena has a serviceable amount of offense for a main eventer, especially since he spends a lot of time selling. It is a strange criticism of him last night when he randomly used a Powerbomb and Michinoku Driver. His range of offense is far greater than that of his predecessors Hogan & Austin. He regularly uses a flying leg drop, diving shoulder block, sit out back drop, STF, release fisherman, cross body. I don't know I've seen a fair bit of Cena and he only ever seems to hit finishers to me. It's like his entire offensive arsenal is built around the idea of the false finish. Product of the time I guess, but as I've watched more 70s wrestling, I've become less and less enamoured at the very concept of a finisher and here's a guy who seems to be only finisher. I did enjoy the match, but I had it at **** and others seem to be talking about it in MOTY terms, so I'm guessing I'm lower than most. Part of me also wonders if that was Scott Steiner circa 1992 or Kurt Angle circa 2002 throwing 20 German suplexes people might not be going so ga ga over it. But Brock seems to get a pass. But you know me, I love suplexes! I didn't think Rollins was very good in the match, and the stretch with Cena brought it down a fair bit. I had the three way at 4 stars too. It was real good, but a lot of aspects I hated. A final singles match between Brock-Cena would had been better. So, where do they go with Mania? Brock-Roman Triple H-Sting Rusev-Cena Rollins-Orton Outside of Rusev-Cena that is a shitty upper card. What are they doing with Dean, Dolph, Bryan who are the main over guys on the roster. Bray? What a mess. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Childs Posted January 26, 2015 Report Share Posted January 26, 2015 I could see the triple threat being a match that looks a little worse when viewed at some remove. But in real time, I found it totally engrossing. I'm mixed on Rollins in general, but I thought he hit most of his big spots in cool, opportunistic ways. And he took some sick bumps off Brock's stuff. I didn't mind the stretch with Cena, because it effectively put over the idea that Brock really might be out of it. I'm not sure how their execution was during those moments, because honestly, I was sucked up in the broader story. As for comparing Brock to Steiner and Angle, two things: 1) Brock is helped by his status as a freak show special attraction. If he was doing that shit every week on TV, it would lose its luster more quickly. 2) People loved Scott Steiner in '92 and Kurt Angle in '02. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matt D Posted January 26, 2015 Report Share Posted January 26, 2015 The selling of one suplex is different than ten too. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flyonthewall2983 Posted January 26, 2015 Report Share Posted January 26, 2015 All I've got to say is this. At least DDP was eliminated on camera. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hammerva Posted January 26, 2015 Report Share Posted January 26, 2015 So apparently Vince is playing the "it is all the city of Philadelphia fault" for the reaction to Roman Reigns according to Meltzer. Might I add that Pittsburgh was the location of last year's Royal Rumble which is either known for a non-insider crowd or a crowd that doesn't give a shit about anything. If they want to play this east coast issue with fan reaction, wait until Wrestlemania at the home of the World Series SF Giants if they have Daniel Bryan in a nothing match Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JerryvonKramer Posted January 26, 2015 Report Share Posted January 26, 2015 As for comparing Brock to Steiner and Angle, two things: 1) Brock is helped by his status as a freak show special attraction. If he was doing that shit every week on TV, it would lose its luster more quickly. 2) People loved Scott Steiner in '92 and Kurt Angle in '02. I guess I'm wondering about those people who are down on Angle in general now or who don't like Sting/Luger vs Steiners. People like my co-host Chad, for example. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bierschwale Posted January 26, 2015 Report Share Posted January 26, 2015 I didn't think Rollins was very good in the match, and the stretch with Cena brought it down a fair bit. Rollins gave an incredible underdog babyface performance for most of the match. So of course his character has to be anything but an underdog babyface. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thebrainfollower Posted January 26, 2015 Report Share Posted January 26, 2015 After seeing last night Jerry can we safely take you out of the Vince is still a genius camp? lol Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NintendoLogic Posted January 26, 2015 Report Share Posted January 26, 2015 WWE's TV rights deal is going to escalate to over $200 million in a few years. NJPW's annual revenue is about $25 million now. Do t worry about WWE. Worry about your own enjoyment. WCW grossed 200 million in 1998. They were gone less than three years later. And they had a hell of lot more structural advantages than current WWE. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
anarchistxx Posted January 26, 2015 Report Share Posted January 26, 2015 That criticism of John Cena is straight out of 2005, Jerry. How long have you been out the WWE loop? Criticizing a WWE worker for lack of moves is an old and outdated trope. It is true they are often limited in that respect but that is down to the style. Cena has a serviceable amount of offense for a main eventer, especially since he spends a lot of time selling. It is a strange criticism of him last night when he randomly used a Powerbomb and Michinoku Driver. His range of offense is far greater than that of his predecessors Hogan & Austin. He regularly uses a flying leg drop, diving shoulder block, sit out back drop, STF, release fisherman, cross body. I don't know I've seen a fair bit of Cena and he only ever seems to hit finishers to me. It's like his entire offensive arsenal is built around the idea of the false finish. Product of the time I guess, but as I've watched more 70s wrestling, I've become less and less enamoured at the very concept of a finisher and here's a guy who seems to be only finisher. That is just the WWE style though, especially in big matches. First half of the match is generally just dull filler, as they waste time until they can start trading finishers and cheap popping the crowd for near falls. I can count on one hand probably the amount of WWE main event level matches with good pacing, build and structure over the last few years. Unfortunately the fans have become conditioned to it also, so unless they are really into the feud or it is a particularly hot crowd they sit on their hands and wait for the big moves to start dropping. I did enjoy the match, but I had it at **** and others seem to be talking about it in MOTY terms, so I'm guessing I'm lower than most. I would have rated it around that also. It was good for what it was i.e. a WWE main event spot fest. Plenty of action, exciting, well laid out, believable near falls. An example of the style done well. It will probably lose a lot watched on tape as oppose to live, because with the drama and uncertainty taken away you are left with incoherent structure, bad/inconsistent selling and over reliance on finishers. It is like NOAH in the first half of the last decade, you expect endless bomb sequences, lack of selling/fighting spirit, lots of chops and strikes that are often brushed off. It is just the style, and at this point there isn't much use complaining about it because the discussions have been raked over again and again. Part of me also wonders if that was Scott Steiner circa 1992 or Kurt Angle circa 2002 throwing 20 German suplexes people might not be going so ga ga over it. But Brock seems to get a pass. It is a bit different - Brock is booked as an unstoppable monster throwing these guys around. There is a purpose to it, and by and large the suplexes are sold like death. Kurt Angle would be doing trading German suplex spots every week until they meant nothing and the move lost any impact. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Russellmania Posted January 26, 2015 Report Share Posted January 26, 2015 claiming that Cena's offense consisted of only the AA in a match where he did a powerbomb and a Michinoku Driver is a surefire way to get me to immediately dismiss everything else that you say. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dwide Schrude Posted January 26, 2015 Report Share Posted January 26, 2015 Sitting here thinking about how they can salvage this mess.... Double turn Reigns and Lesnar (even though Brock is already getting cheered and Reigns is already getting booed) in the build to Mania with Heyman managing Reigns, and both of them sort of joining the authority, leaving Seth Rollins a forgotten man. Reigns conquers Lesnar at Wrestlemania much to the chagrin of everyone in attendance, then Seth Rollins cashes in and takes the title catapulting himself into being one of the biggest babyfaces in the company. Cena loses to Rusev at Fast Lane, Daniel Bryan vs Rusev at Wrestlemania. A far more likely scenario being: Bryan loses to Rusev at Fast Lane, John Cena vs Rusev I was responding to a guy coming up with a scenario in which they would salvage the mess they made at the Rumble. Unless you were just being tongue in cheek. In that case, disregard. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sporadic Posted January 26, 2015 Report Share Posted January 26, 2015 Well, Vince is finally getting his mainstream attention he desires... http://time.com/3682093/cancel-wwe-network-royal-rumble/ http://ftw.usatoday.com/2015/01/wwe-daniel-bryant-royal-rumble-eliminated-reaction http://www.foxsports.com/buzzer/story/wwe-royal-rumble-daniel-bryan-brock-lesnar-roman-reigns-the-rock-012515 And blaming the Reigns backlash on Philly? Unreal... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
El-P Posted January 26, 2015 Report Share Posted January 26, 2015 Rock is like "welp, that didn't work". Tells the whole story. The best match (the only good match) of the undercard actually happened during the pre-show. The undercard was a waste. Glad to see a NAO match in 2015 is exactly like one in 1999. People popping for the catchphrase then dying during the wrestling. The Ascension is terrible. Downright awful. The whole Mizdow has run its course yesterday. Makes the tag title matches a big joke. I'd argue that Nicky Bella was the best worker of this undercard actually. Then this triple threat match. Well, that was quite the epic spectacle. Brock is unique. I wasn't a fan of kicking out of a hundred AA (yeah, that finisher is kinda useless) but really, this was one of the best triple threat match I've ever seen (not a fan of the concept, especially without elimination). If they called an audible, then they did a terrific job. Maybe not MOTYC on rewatch, but as it is, yeah pretty terrific spectacle. Then. Well. I have no words. Yeah, Buh-buh was a nice surprise entrance, like DDP was. But then. Well, what can I add that hasn't been said. I dind't think they could be that dumb. But they are. The crowd non-stop booing is one of the most amazing thing I've seen on a wrestling show. The pop the "feel-good" entrance weren't half as strong as expected, and died immediately. Then when it couldn't get worse, the Big Show and freaking KANE in the final four. I dreaded Orton showing up, but this was even worse. And Rusev hiding out to be eliminated like nothing afterward ? Well. Poor Roman Reigns. When THE ROCK can't save the mess, you're in deep shit. These people are dumb as fuck. Vince blaming Philly is hilarious. Because if you know anything about your audience, you don't do this kind of shit in Philly to begin with ! What a pathetic whiny douchebag. So yeah. Amazing, amazing to witness. They learned jackshit from last year, and obviously don't want Daniel Bryan to be a top guy. Ok. Good luck then. Hope people are gonna get pumped up by that Roman Reigns push to the sky and by a 55 year old Sting. Reach for the future. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Childs Posted January 26, 2015 Report Share Posted January 26, 2015 As for comparing Brock to Steiner and Angle, two things: 1) Brock is helped by his status as a freak show special attraction. If he was doing that shit every week on TV, it would lose its luster more quickly. 2) People loved Scott Steiner in '92 and Kurt Angle in '02. I guess I'm wondering about those people who are down on Angle in general now or who don't like Sting/Luger vs Steiners. People like my co-host Chad, for example. Again, the special attraction thing is a part of it. As is the fact that Brock is portraying a monster, which Scotty and Angle never were. I'm not a fan of Sting/Luger vs. the Steiners but my criticism has nothing to do with the match being a spotfest. The opening few minutes were great, but then they got really sloppy, and the whole thing petered out to a shit finish. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stiva Posted January 26, 2015 Report Share Posted January 26, 2015 Makes sense that they'd look to blame it on another "minority" crowd reaction. For a company that won't shut the fuck up about trending on Twitter, they seem pretty dismissive of #CancelWWENetwork being the number one trend worldwide for a while. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JerryvonKramer Posted January 26, 2015 Report Share Posted January 26, 2015 claiming that Cena's offense consisted of only the AA in a match where he did a powerbomb and a Michinoku Driver is a surefire way to get me to immediately dismiss everything else that you say. Weird overreaction. I saw a lot of AAs and not a lot else. After seeing last night Jerry can we safely take you out of the Vince is still a genius camp? lol Do we know that Vince is booking this? It doesn't seem like it to me at all. Because through all his years as a promoter, one thing you can say about Vince is that he never tried to get cutesy. The booking of the Rumble match was truly baffling to me, to a point where I it's hard to believe Vince was directly involved with it. If he was responsible for laying out that match, or even the bullet points - Build Bray early - Bryan enters when Bray is there - Bryan gets eliminated almost incidentally - Bray gets eliminated almost incidentally - Blah blah - Kane - Blah - Big Show - Blah - Rusev - Blah - Roman - Rock If Vince thought that was a good idea, and man-managed it himself, then yes he's lost it totally. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
goc Posted January 26, 2015 Report Share Posted January 26, 2015 If they were determined to do the Roman Reigns push, the smart idea would have been to tell Daniel Bryan to keep it quiet that he could return and leave him as Plan B if the Royal Rumble didn't work out. Instead they essentially set themselves up for what happened last night by bringing him back and having him look like a chump in the Rumble. If you had the big Roman Reigns backlash last night without Bryan's return then you can at least counter that the next night on Raw with a surprise Daniel Bryan return. Now they have absolutely nothing in the bag to pull out and turn this around. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.