Jump to content
Pro Wrestling Only

Recommended Posts

Posted

Every interview I hear and article I read involving Russo, he never says sports entertainment or sports entertainers. Always wrestling and wrestlers. It's creeping me out.

  • Replies 9.6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Posted

I was excited for the Stardust talk because I had no idea what pop reference they'd get. if any.

 

Bryan went for NES' Pro Wrestling Starman and then Dave said NO NO NO, it's Dusty Rhodes' nickname Stardust. Bryan made sure to point out that he had gloves like AJ Styles. No mention of Bowie. No mention of A Clockwork Orange. No thought that this will lead to a split.

Posted

If we get one Stardust promo with Cody encouraging Goldust to indulge in some of the old ultraviolence, I'll never say a bad word about any other angle for years.

Posted

I think poor Dave is overworked:

 

BqcHho7CEAAYVmH.png

It only takes a second to proofread a tweet but it seems everyone is in a hurry to get it out there.

Posted

Meltzer:

--It was seven years ago today that Nancy Benoit was killed, likely by husband Chris. Nancy was known in wrestling as The Fallen Angel and later as Woman in Florida, WCW and ECW.

 

likely?

 

There's not any real doubt that he killed her.

Posted

Seven years already. Times flies. I can still remember the hours spent on my laptot following the developments in disbelief.

 

And yeah, the "likely" is sounds awkward to say the least.

Posted

That's a palm-to-the-face slip from Meltz. "Likely"?

 

Did he follow-it up about the 20th anniversary of Nicole Brown Simpson and Ron Goldman's deaths "likely" at the hands of OJ Simpson?

 

Or that the sky is "likely" blue?

 

That quote has me legit laughing.

Posted

The Benoits, who believe he did it, are going to sue Meltzer?

 

Hey man, I'm just saying that in today's society it's always wise to cover all your bases, and maybe that's why he tossed the likely in there. It also may be a stupid mistake, or just him not using his words wisely.

Posted

You cannot slander or libel the dead. There is absolutely no need for any "likely" or "allegedly" qualifier, at all.

 

That depends on the state/nation, as some states and countries do allow lawsuits on behalf of the estate of the deceased in cases of libel/slander.

Posted

Not speaking the truth for fear of the reaction would be a poor reflection on Dave's integrity and I'm not willing to go that far.

 

He definitely deserves criticism, but I would suspect he said it without putting much thought into it. He has a tendency to do this lately, like when he said both sides had valid points and probably felt they were right when asked about Montreal on the Steve Austin Show, completely contradicting years of his own reporting on that topic.

Posted

To be fair, Meltzer has never been a great writer. Great reporter, yes. Great writer, no.

 

Yeah, that genuinely could just be a pure syntax screw-up. I doubt that it is, but it wouldn't be a big surprise, You don't go to Dave for the prose.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...