SteveJRogers Posted April 13, 2015 Report Share Posted April 13, 2015 Doesn't the fact they are in their own section indicate that they are going to be taken down? Why do that? Why not just add them to the main Raw section? Maybe because that has been a constant request that they felt "obligated" to do notify subscribers and users (this month is free) what stuff is considered part of the official Attitude Era. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pantherwagner Posted April 13, 2015 Report Share Posted April 13, 2015 My guess is that they probably think (and rightfully so) that some people wouldn't notice if they were silently uploaded in their folders. It's kind of ridiculous that there's nowhere on the network itself to see what has been uploaded recently. I know that there's a reddit bot and a twitter bot out there... but the latter has got only 3000 subscribers. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stiva Posted April 13, 2015 Report Share Posted April 13, 2015 I see the Raws post-Survivor Series 97 are up but they've left the whole of 97 blank. That's one of their best years, even if it's not pushed as heavily as 98. I hope they fill that gap soon. Hopefully along with 1997 Nitros. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JNLister Posted April 13, 2015 Report Share Posted April 13, 2015 For what it's worth, whenever they put up a temporary section and then take it down, the usual deal seems to be that anything that can fit into an existing section (eg World Class TV) gets moved there and everything else gets deleted. Â Of course, there's no real reason to delete anything. I get the horrible impression they've set the menu structure up so that there's a limit on how many sections they can have and how many things can be displayed in each section. As I've previously mentioned, there are a few things such as the 1993 and 1994 Hall of Fame that are still up there (and can be accessed if you have the URL) but can't be accessed through any of the menus. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
C.S. Posted April 14, 2015 Report Share Posted April 14, 2015 As I've previously mentioned, there are a few things such as the 1993 and 1994 Hall of Fame that are still up there (and can be accessed if you have the URL) but can't be accessed through any of the menus. Â Can you give us those URLs or link us to a source that has them? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JNLister Posted April 14, 2015 Report Share Posted April 14, 2015 Complete list in chronological order: http://www.reddit.com/r/wwenetwork/wiki/wwe_network_shows#wiki_1994  Hall of Fame section from a different site, which has stuff in the same sections as the Network itself: http://returntotherunway.com/wwenetwork/getCategory.php?category=Wwe%20Hall%20Of%20Fame  On the latter, you need to click on the eye icon to the left to go to the relevant WWE Network page. For stuff that's been deleted you'll still get a page, with listing, on WWE Network but the video will just bring up an error message.  Note also on the latter you can not only choose 'Wrestlers' to get a list of all the matches a guy has on the network, but you can then go to 'rivals and partners' to get all their matches against a particular person, in date order, including tags, and without spoilers. Why WWE can't do this is another matter... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Chief Posted April 14, 2015 Report Share Posted April 14, 2015 Decided to watch a 98 Raw while it's up there, popped in the night after KOTR. Some thoughts: Â Physically, Regal looks horrible. But even if he was in shape, I don't think there's a chance in hell his style gets over in front of a 1998 WWF crowd. Â Everything the DOA gets involved in is terrible. Â Ken Shamrock is seriously the most uncoordinated, dangerous looking wrestler of all time. He's trying, but there's such a recklessness to everything he does. It's kind of uncomfortable to watch. Â I haven't seen any of the Brawl For All stuff since it aired. I'll admit, I kind of liked it. Some of these match ups are interesting to watch with the proper context. You can tell Steve Blackman is winning his match as diplomatically as possible. IIRC, he dropped out after the first round because he thought it was ridiculous. Such a bizarre experiment. Â They DON'T EVEN MENTION Mankind getting tossed off the cell the night before. There's some brief lip service to it in the main event and Foley is in a backstage segment with Kane and Paul Bearer, besides that, nothing. This completely shocked me given how important the incident is in WWE lore. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
artDDP Posted April 14, 2015 Report Share Posted April 14, 2015 FWIW wasn't Vince furious they did it and maybe didn't want to seem to condone it the next night? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sek69 Posted April 16, 2015 Report Share Posted April 16, 2015 So they skipped the gun angle episode, as I remember at the time WWF was more upset at the f bomb that went out uncensored rather than the implied homicide. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MikeCampbell Posted April 17, 2015 Report Share Posted April 17, 2015 The gun episode is up now. I won't be able to watch it until the morning at the earliest, so maybe someone else can see if the F-bomb is present (they've got a good track record of keeping things intact). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MikeCampbell Posted April 17, 2015 Report Share Posted April 17, 2015 I put it on for background noise while i was working, since it's a slow night, with a light workload. The F-bomb is intact! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grimmas Posted April 17, 2015 Report Share Posted April 17, 2015 Did they remove those ECW shows (Cyberslam, N2R '95, etc...)? I was looking last night and couldn't find them. Have they been moved to some weird section or were they taken down? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SteveMPunk Posted April 17, 2015 Report Share Posted April 17, 2015 Did they remove those ECW shows (Cyberslam, N2R '95, etc...)? I was looking last night and couldn't find them. Have they been moved to some weird section or were they taken down? Â They're still there, in the Vault under the ECW Exposed section. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WingedEagle Posted April 18, 2015 Report Share Posted April 18, 2015 Not home right now so I can't check, but does the '05 version of One Night Stand include the original music or is everything dubbed over? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sek69 Posted April 19, 2015 Report Share Posted April 19, 2015 Dubbed, but it's not that distracting until the main event. Sandman's entrance loses all the emotional impact without Metallica. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WingedEagle Posted April 19, 2015 Report Share Posted April 19, 2015 Is that the case on the DVD as well? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pantherwagner Posted April 19, 2015 Report Share Posted April 19, 2015 I have been watching some late 97 and early 98 Raws from the last batch upload, mostly as background noise while I do other things. I had not watched any of these since they aired and they are as horrible as I remembered them being. Undertaker, HHH and Shawn Michaels are so bad at promos that it is embarrassing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blehschmidt Posted April 19, 2015 Report Share Posted April 19, 2015 Yes, Sandman's entrance is overdubbed on the DVD as well. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stiva Posted April 19, 2015 Report Share Posted April 19, 2015 I have been watching some late 97 and early 98 Raws from the last batch upload, mostly as background noise while I do other things. I had not watched any of these since they aired and they are as horrible as I remembered them being. Undertaker, HHH and Shawn Michaels are so bad at promos that it is embarrassing. Â Yeah, the Michaels promos from the screwjob onwards are awful, It's weird because, as he settled into a natural heel role through 97, he was great. But his run through November 97-Mania isn't great at all. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pantherwagner Posted April 20, 2015 Report Share Posted April 20, 2015 I'm surprised that Scott Stanford has got a job. He's older than the WWE prototype announcer and looks like a wax figure. Maybe Vince likes to hire people with NXT-ready real names (I can't believe Canyon Ceman is a person's real name). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KrisZ Posted April 20, 2015 Report Share Posted April 20, 2015 Scott is also one of the top sportscasters in New York City which helps him out. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Chief Posted April 20, 2015 Report Share Posted April 20, 2015 I had no clue Stanford was still with the company. I kind of liked him back when he did Superstars years ago, surprised he's still around. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MikeCampbell Posted April 26, 2015 Report Share Posted April 26, 2015 Three new Raws added from 1996 this weekend. The next two in order, the night after Survivor Series and the following week, and then we jump ahead to the night after IYH It's Time. I swear, they're doing this on purpose to troll us OCD smarks. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Parties Posted April 27, 2015 Report Share Posted April 27, 2015 Weird situation with King of the Ring where it was kind of announced last night as a flashed logo, only to have the first half of the tournament tonight and the second half live Tuesday on the network. 1st round is:  Dean Ambrose vs. Sheamus Neville vs. Luke Harper R-Truth vs. Stardust Dolph Ziggler vs. Bad News Barrett  Feels like an obvious win for Barrett as an extension of his character, and an appetite suppressant for lack of an IC title picture right now. Sheamus has already won one of these and none of the other options make sense, unless they want Ambrose to become even more of a comedy goof. Also kind of odd that we've seen so many of the potential finals (Barrett-Ambrose, Barrett-Neville, Ziggler-Sheamus) in recent weeks. For novelty alone I'd be inclined to go heel v. heel in the finals and just have Sheamus and Barrett lariat each other for 10 minutes. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
goc Posted April 27, 2015 Report Share Posted April 27, 2015 I just want to see Harper wearing the crown and robe. It's not like it'll mean anything after a few weeks so might as well get something fun out of it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.